The red line helps identifying easy to miss issues with cut-outs. With a clean cut-out, you would see only a single thin line around the object. The effect here in this asset looks like you, using an automatic background remover.    Check also here the corners. Some of the initial background survived. ... View more

Just looking at my post a second time, and I see additional cutout errors. Doung cutouts is time consuming. That's the reason, why some prefer correctly cutout assets, instead of doing the hard work themselves. ... View more

Just checking a small part of 5555, I see multiple issues in the texture and in the cutout work. You should start learning, how to do cutoutwork on sharp edges.  ... View more

It seems that the approval or denial to upload an image depends entirely on a particular moderator, who is currently working on the shift. By @AviPicBox Which one of the few thousand moderators do you mean? If you look at the database growth, there is no doubt that Adobe needs to occupy a lot of moderators. Chances are, that you never get the same moderator twice. ... View more

(...) and is used by the public. By @elsantosguerra This is irrelevant.    And even if the building has some age, something may be protected. IP is complex. ... View more

In addition, I see at least one IP violations. ... View more

Who reviews adobe stock images is it a Human or an AI? I have had content rejected for the wrong reasons, the photos comply with the rules. By @elsantosguerra Humans. And in most cases, the refusal is correct, sometimes, the refusal is warrented, but the reason given is incorrect, an only in a very small number of cases, we can't see the refusal reason. ... View more

Sorry, but I sawon this small part of your asset 3 IP violations. That were easy findings. They are not recognizable brands, they are the names of buildings. They do not represent a registered trademark, nor any intellectual property. By @elsantosguerra There is no need for a registred trademark to get a refusal for IP violations. Indeed, it is enough that there is a doubt on the IP status.  ... View more

Mabe telling us about the issue would be helpful to you. We can decide to move your question to whichever location in this forum. So please do not write tons of text, get straight to the problem description, and please without any sidelines. They are not helpful and distract from the issue. ... View more

@YAUAU , You've written a screen full of text, without giving information about your issue. ... View more

What is your OS and printer? ... View more

One year prepaid plans can be cancelled immediately after the initial 14 days, and they will continue until the end of the paid periode. That's exactly what your screens are showing. And that's disabling auto renewal.    You did not read the 233 days of continued service! ... View more

It may also be a caching issue in the browser. Or a bug in the contributor's interface. Your description points to both possibilities. ... View more

You could use a clipping mask. In that case, your asset conforms to the requirement, but the buyer still can modify the asset to show also clipped data. ... View more

It is imposible that ALL of them have problem. By @Luichi Tejeda Why not?   If you are new to stock, you should consider these resources: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/tutorials.html Please read the contributor user manual for more information on Adobe stock contributions: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html See here for rejection reasons: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html and especially quality and technical issues: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html ... View more

You are talking about videos and images. Your images are never 300Mb, when submitted. Video may be, but let's see the images first.  ... View more

Your assets have Quality issues, which is more than the stock text says. Do not think that the text is targeted to your assets. It only tells you the most common issues in all assets refused by Adobe. You need to post one or two here in the quality as submitted so that we can check trhem. ... View more

So i assume they have changed something in the AI system of review which causes majority of files to be rejected with quality issues even if they dont have. By @di-photo That's a good approach. Simply assume that Adobe changed something, as they are changing permanently, by adding new moderators to the system. According to Adobe, moderators are real and not piloted by AI. No ofence but you do not need to work for Adobe directly to see issues in your pictures. ... View more

Yes they do. You have the rights to challenge. At the end of the day we are the one bringing the revenew. If you challenge and your pictures are fine they get to be reviewed second time by someone else and they do pass. Had a whole batch like that. By @di-photo You can challenge everything, but they won't seriously review any refused asset again. Anyone would challenge any refusal, and that would simply eat up all the moderation resources they have. They may pick-up from time to time one or the other refusal, but I strongly doubt that for a standard refusal, they will do anything, except referring you to this forum. ... View more

Not sure where you get your information from. They do actually respond.  By @di-photo Sure, they respond. But I would be surprised if they would do anything error analysis of your assets. ... View more

Reviews are done by humans.  a) There may be AI adisory, but the decision is taken by humans. b) Accepted assets somewhere else does not mean that Adobe stock will accept them. The moderation system is very different from stock image provider to a different one. c) What is a GM II? d) having a professional camera does not mean that you get error free assets, you have just a better starting point for this. e) Generative AI is a big business for Adobe, but they still are promoting also professional quality assets.  ... View more

Editorial use only assets can not be used for advertising. They are not cleared for commercial use. ... View more

Du fügst die Quellenangabe da ein, wo es am besten geht. Die Regeln hier sind flexibel. Allerdings muss man Quellenangabe machen, bei redaktioneller Verwendung. ... View more

Don't post licensed assets here. Post only a link to the asset or a watermarked preview here. I will remove the attachement. ... View more

1. Das machst Du mit Deinem Arbeitgeber aus. Da gibt es von Adobe aus keine Beschränkung.   (Bei den Stockmedien ist Dein Arbeitgeber für die Lizensgerechte verwendung verantwortlich. Ohne schriftliches Abkommen mit dem Kunden würde ich, als Verantwortlicher, das nicht machen. Aber es spricht nichts dagegen, von Adobe aus gesehen.)   2) Wenn der Post reine Werbung ist, analog zu den Werbeseiten in einer Zeitschrift,, und kein "Inhalt", analog zum Inhalt einer Zeitschrift, wegen dessen ich mir die Zeitschrift kaufe, dann ist das ohne Quellenangabe möglich. ... View more

No credit is required for regular assets. However, credit is required for editorial articles.   https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/help/usage-licensing.html ＞Do I need to add a photo credit? By @yamato7 All editorial use requires crediting the source regardless of the licence or thze type of the asset (editorial use only or not).   Editorial use only assets can only be used for editorial use. That is a limitation, as you can't create an advert with such assets. ... View more

???? tell me dont spam, later i spam you talk to me again   By @HORROR AMBIENCE You need to wait, we are volunteers and have also other things to do. We will answer you, when we have the time to do so. ... View more