I've posted this, but I think we need to get back to basics.
>What Adobe wants to hear is cogent, rational and professional responses to their proposals to change the forums.
>See, Oz, that's the problem. We are not being told in any detail what their proposals are, and we have no idea how much we can influence them.
>Take the issue of a 'question answered' indication. Will there be one? In what form? Is there any point saying whether we want one or not?
>We just get fuzzy, obscure comments about how some things might be there out of the box, it might be possible to add or subtract some features, but we don't know whether or which.
>If Adobe wants cogent, rational and professional responses, they (it?) really need(s?) to make some cogent, rational and professional proposals for us to discuss.
>Otherwise we're going round in circles.