Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Join us today at our #AdobeMAX keynote, live at 9:30 a.m. PT with CEO Shantanu Narayen and SVP @DWadhwani: http://adobe.ly/AdobeNext
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
If you like the cloud, and it works for you, you don't need to be on this thread. Your comments are irrelevant.
Are you serious!. Very open minded of you to call anyones opinions "irrelevant".
Do you work for the government?
We, and there are many of us (doesn't matter how much you try to ignore that fact), want Adobe to offer a perpetual license of it's software.
I know...we all know...we all heard you the first time and we understood!
You are far from being ignored in but the arguments are just "noise" due to the echo.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
>You are far from being ignored
Well... not ignored HERE, but it doesn't seem that Adobe is paying much attention... at least nobody at Adobe who could change the current policy
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
You call it just noise, yet here you are, reading it and responding to it.
Also I find it quite ironic how you say someone is close minded from calling opinions "irrelevant" while you yourself seem to have no issue calling them "noise".
By the way Shooternz, I think it was you who was ridiculing me for suggesting that NSA might be interested in the data of Adobe users as a tool of industrial spying? Did you by any chance happen to read the news yesterday about them doing exactly that (gathering foreign business secrets and using them to benefit the US)? I'm sure the rest of the world will happily allow Adobe to access all their files after this! Embrace the cloud!
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
> but it doesn't seem that Adobe is paying much attention... at least nobody at Adobe who could change the current policy
This is not being ignored. We forward these threads to the folks who make the decisions. We even make arguments advocating for some things and explaining context for specific communities.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
By the way Shooternz, I think it was you who was ridiculing me for suggesting that NSA might be interested in the data of Adobe users as a tool of industrial spying?
What data are you giving to Adobe ?
They have my email address, my password for the forums and software. They know my name, business address and phone number. They have my serial information.
They have no credit card details of mine.
They do have a record of the crap I spout around these parts which is worrying only to myself.
Cant think of anything there ... that would be of value to the NSA.
"Noise"...yep..I am part of the noise. Forums are a conversation and reading and responding is how that works.
I am largely here for the entertainment since the arguments have long since been exhausted.
FWIW - I have never argued for against the CC model and never tried tro convince anyone either way. ( I dont care ).
I do enjoy arguing the arguments those.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
What data are you giving to Adobe ?
Not much, since my workstation stays offline.
Cant think of anything there ... that would be of value to the NSA.
You must be aware of Adobe offering cloud space and encouraging people to upload their work files to the cloud? I mean it's called "creative cloud" for a reason. I believe the voluntary cloud space that we have now is just the beginning. In a few years Adobe will likely make you connect to their servers more and more to "enhance your user experience". I bet they will soon announce something like actual cloud processing. "Give your AE files to the cloud and we will render them there for your benefit".
I'm sure you can see the trend where Adobe wants to go next. That's why they bought Behance. That's why they force you to activate more frequently. And that's why they are branding it Creative Cloud. They want to have the users "connected".
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I am fully aware of the cloud storage but have no intention or need to utilise it.
Figure that I am more at risk from Drop Boxes and emailing files around the place.
Certainly not paranoid that any of my work (TVCs) is "rocket science" ...or will create harm to anyone should it be "discovered.
For the record. I am appalled at the level of surveillance ...undertaken on global citizens and equally so by the "invasiveness"from all software.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Even if you don't use the cloud storage, Adobe can still connect you to the internet whenever it wants.
"The software may cause customers computer, without additional notice and on an intermittent or regular basis, to automatically connect to the internet..."
"Adobe, in its sole discretion, may (but has no obligation to) monitor or review the Services and Materials at any time. Without limiting the foregoing, Adobe shall have the right, in its sole discretion, to remove any of Your Material for any reason (or no reason), including if it violates the Terms or any Law."
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Andy Bay wrote:By the way Shooternz, I think it was you who was ridiculing me for suggesting that NSA might be interested in the data of Adobe users as a tool of industrial spying? Did you by any chance happen to read the news yesterday about them doing exactly that (gathering foreign business secrets and using them to benefit the US)? I'm sure the rest of the world will happily allow Adobe to access all their files after this! Embrace the cloud!
On an OT note, if we can take any wisdom from the Snowden/Guardian revelations, it is to assume (as the nerds have said for years) absolutely anything and everything we do on a computer connected to a network can and probably is prone to scrutiny by a third party, whether it be a major government, crime syndicate, marketing body, whomever. CC or CS is irrelevant to this particular sidetrack.
No reason not to sleep at night, just something to be mindful of should, say hypothetically, the Tea Party ever take power in the US and start burning books and locking up liberals. For there are no conservatives in the media industry. (tongue firmly in cheek)
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
PaulM-Aus, I think there is a difference though. I can have any of the CS packages running for years without touching the internet and that's exactly what I'm doing. My work computer is never connected to any network, not even any local ones. With CC there is just no way of keeping the workstation sterile, as Adobe can make you connect on "an intermittent or regular basis" and there is nothing you can do about it (that is if you want to keep using your programs).
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I have no way to keep my systems "sterile" apart from "reasonable good practice" just because of the amount of creative and technical collaboration required.
Files of many types must come and go ..cross platform and cross facilities.
Be out of business in a month without "connections" of some kind.
What type of work do you do Andy... that you can avoid moving files and data around in such a safe environment?
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
It need only be a blip every 99 (?) days when required. Admittedly a key logger trojan could dump down captures in the few seconds necessary to confirm activation, but then (subscription-based) malware security software would protect again that. I think in the case you list we're talking about zero risk versus infinitesimal risk. If absolute integrity of the workstation is critical (ie. you contract for the NSA) then I'd be looking elsewhere for software. Alternatively you could try talking to Adobe and see what they offered in your situation - I'm sure they have experience working around this very issue with the odd security-critical enterprise client.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
It was in a Cloud forum and I didn't save a link, but a few days ago I read a message from a REALLY upset person who had put some files "in the Cloud" at some Adobe address and was now VERY unhappy they had no access to their files because they had stopped paying for their subscription
I personally think it was THAT PERSON'S fault for not copying their files back down to their computer(s) before stopping the subscription... but it is an example of how someone can have problems due to not reading/understanding how a Cloud subscription works
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
PaulM-Aus, like I quoted earlier, Adobe has the right to put you online whenever they want, without even letting you know about it. They also have the right to force you online as they wish and if you don't comply they can stop your programs from working. There is nothing that limits them to 99 day intervals.
I have one question for you:
If (and when) in the future Adobe announces that users now need to get online even more often, in order to "improve the user experience", what can you do about it? Adobe can force you online every day if they feel like it, and you have to keep obeying, if you have native CC-files that you need to access.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Me personally? Like shooternz, constant connectivity is critical to business (which is why I'm bummed we're not getting the lightning fast ALP NBN, for all those who follow Oz news - NZ: you've got Kim Dot Com's fibre network to look forward to..). Would I have issue having to get online more often? Of course not - I'm online 100% of the time anyway.
The way I see it Adobe are a corporation. Like Apple, Google and Facebook before them I assume all my corporations are trickling data to any authority with the money to buy it or court orders to force them to. Such is digital life in a paranoid market economy. Am I happy about it? Not particularly. Does it change my work practices? Not in the slightest. Do I assume Avid, Autodesk and others aren't and won't ever data mine? Not for a second.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
shooternz wrote:
As I said - Show me a postive CC thread from happy supporters as long as this thread is.
You certainly dig deep to make a desparate argument
This thread consists of mostly you and a few others in an echo chamber and could hardly be called a valid poll.
Not very deep, I don't even have to hit the dirt with the shovel - just a fact. People can't find one. You want a valid poll? You already know about the online petition against CC. This thread is still being discussed how long after CC's released? There are quite a few people in this thread beyond me and "a few others." When online articles popup about CC - scroll down to the comments section - again mostly negative.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Andy Bay wrote:
What data are you giving to Adobe ?Not much, since my workstation stays offline.
Cant think of anything there ... that would be of value to the NSA.You must be aware of Adobe offering cloud space and encouraging people to upload their work files to the cloud? I mean it's called "creative cloud" for a reason. I believe the voluntary cloud space that we have now is just the beginning. In a few years Adobe will likely make you connect to their servers more and more to "enhance your user experience". I bet they will soon announce something like actual cloud processing. "Give your AE files to the cloud and we will render them there for your benefit".
I'm sure you can see the trend where Adobe wants to go next. That's why they bought Behance. That's why they force you to activate more frequently. And that's why they are branding it Creative Cloud. They want to have the users "connected".
Another reason why I will never do CC beyond the ridiculous subscription notion.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
And what if my car starts shooting arrows at the moon? Not to be disrespectful but I would comment that some of the Angry Anti-CC Crowd seem to be able to come up with amazing scenarios to try and get us who just work as-is to be Horrified and Trembling. Really now.
Adobe is a company, which is a group of humans working sort of mostly together on a really wide range of things. REALLY wide, in Adobe's sphere. Spheres.
Could they do something vile to their user-base down the road? Same as EVERY other company out there, yea. Will they? Same as nearly every other company out there, not too likely. If they do, we're adults, we'll deal with it. And move on. Horribilizing the future tends to make the present less ... productive. Being aware of a wide range of possible changes? Totally wise. Spending one's time horribilizing? Not so wise.
As so many others, most of my professional work involves moving files and processes and data forth and back between computers/users within our own facility, and also of course to specialist vendors or to the clients. All our computers need be "webbed" for actual daily use. We have a great system's pro to work our walls and protocols ... but ... as much and as easily as we have to inter-connect, there's possibilities for a talented hacker that oh well ... back up, keep changing settings, clone your system drives ... and get back to work.
My wife and I chuckle ... darkly, I might note ... at the comment we see every once in a while "Google is Skynet!" If you understand that comment, well ... perhaps. (If you don't, google "skynet" ) Still, we have some things run through Google's ubiquitous apps. Do we trust Google? Um ... not really. But we get our work done.
And we do prefer having a ton more software tools available to us for about what we were paying annually before. And also like the small monthly payment rather than writing big chunks every now and then. So ... what's the change meant to us? More software available, small predictable monthy payments, no more out-the-door expenses over all. That's it, sum and total. Oh, and they update the product more often.
But then, we're used to paying subscription-servicing/pricing models to software vendors. Several of the other companies we deal with are totally subscription also. Can you believe it, our FINANCIAL management software is subscription! Just think of the HORRIBLE things they could do to us!
Neil
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Angry Anti-CC Crowd seem to be able to come up with amazing scenarios
Funny to see this attitude two days after it was revealed how NSA is participating in corporate spying to give US advantage over the rest of the world.
Will they? Same as nearly every other company out there, not too likely. If they do, we're adults, we'll deal with it.
You won't probably ever even find out that they did it. But your customers will have their marketing secrets leaked to US based competitors.
All our computers need be "webbed" for actual daily use.
All of them? Really? I have specific computers for online use and others that never go online. It's not that tough to manage, but let's me sleep better at night not having to worry about nice things like cryptolockers (google it).
predictable monthy payments
Predictable for now. You have no idea how much you will be paying after a few years.
But then, we're used to paying subscription-servicing/pricing models to software vendors.
If you love subscriptions so much, I take it that you also rent your house and car? Are you also wishing for your desktop computer and mobile phone operating systems to become subscription software?
Just think of the HORRIBLE things they could do to us!
There is plenty of competition for financial management software to keep the companies in check. Adobe thinks it has a monopoly.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
R. Neil Haugen wrote:
Just think of the HORRIBLE things they could do to us!
Neil
Time will tell won't it..... When a company takes away choice after proudly using it in their advertising a few years ago....
When a company casts aside a portion of their customer base and ignores their business $ there is little doubt for many they could do it again on another issue...
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
My ... the humor of this thread keeps going on and on.
Oh, yea, I'm SO worried my marketing secrets are SO important they'll be shared by the NSA! You can't really be serious about that comment? Scratch that ..." paranoia strikes deep ... into the heart it will creep ... "
All our computers are on our internal network so we don't have to hand-carry drives back and forth, and have quick usage of material. We don't have spare computers lying around. And all of us here use the web as a standard part of our working life ... calendars, email, client contacts, you name it. So ... yes, I find the whole idea of TERRIBLE FEAR OF ... others ... rather humorous. We back up, we clone, we have good "walls" and protocols. And we just work. And if you can figure out how anything here is useful to the NSA I'll laugh myself silly. Nothing we do is all that earth-shaking.
Do understand, I'm NOT a fan of the sort of data-probing they've clearly done.
And the whole thing about "But you don't know what they'll (Adobe) be charging in future years!" is such a pile of bunk. YOU don't know what the per-license for anything YOU'VE got will be in several years. And I'll be able to migrate away from Adobe just as easily as you any time I choose. Silly argument.
And the "if you love subscriptions so much ... " comment ... really now. I hope you are capable of better rhetorical arguments than that. Why do you insist on bringing emotions into it? I didn't say anything whatever ... nor imply anything ... that I had ANY emotional attachment to ANY kind of purchase/delivery model. You apparently are rather unaware of how many people do thoroughly enjoy renting or leasing apartments, houses, and cars. By preference, after having also owned the same. I've rented, owned, and leased all kinds of things. Somehow, I've survived! Amazing, that ... really!
Good criminy, "subscription" services of all kinds of services and products have been used for centuries. So flipping WHAT?! If the product or service works fine for someone that way, either as vendor or client, GREAT. If not ... GREAT. Why do you have such a strong emotional reaction to subscrption models? It certainly can be a preference for certain things one way or the other but to take this to the extreme you seem to is rather ... well ... extreme.
And whether or not Adobe thinks they have a monopoly ... they don't. If at some point I don't appreciate their products/services/support as much as someone else's, I'll have the same ability to choose to go elsewhere as you or any other human. You seem to insist that Adobe will have some what ... thought control? ... blackmail threat? ... something? ... to compel me and others to simply quiver in fear and pay any exorbitant fee they come up with, and accept any proviso they demand, without any recourse to any other option. Wow, just bizarre. I do find your clear assumption that you've got the FUTURE spelled out so much better than anyone that doesn't agree with you rather insulting to the intelligence and character of all those who don't choose your line of ... reating. I DON'T have a crystal ball, and don't feel a need for one. When any company I deal with changes the "deal", I make decisions and roll with it.
I'm not stupid, vapid, or a dependent child, nor intimidated by anyone. But I do find the whole tenor of this thread funny. Or I wouldn't be bothering with it. I'm certainly not intimidated by the level of reasoning in the arguments here. Living one's life in such fear ... well, it does seem sad, after a while.
Neil
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
coroner ...
"When a company casts aside a portion of their customer base and ignores their business $ there is little doubt for many they could do it again on another issue..."
Companies are not entities in and of themselves. They are ... get this! HUMANS. Who yes, could choose to do any durn thing they like at any time. Go figure, huh? The same as ... oh yea, any other group of humans. Wow.
Over the last 50 year as I've watched the world go by (not counting the first ten, though even they I was more aware of "the world" than most of my peers) I've noted many companies change their product lines, identities, delivery models, pricing structures, let go of chunks of user-base to go after other segments of potential markets, any blame thing you can think of. Sometimes it's worked out well, sometimes not so much. So ... again ... in what possible way is what Adobe is doing different than any other company I've EVER seen? Oh ... that would be ... nothing.
They've made decisions as to how to deliver their product, pricing, and what sort of client-base is their "ideal client", just like any and EVERY other company. Just as my company has done numerous times over the last 35 years. You know, when I first started as a portrait photographer, my prices were rather low. I got better at it, better at looking at the books, and realized I needed to up my prices a CHUNK to make a living. Did some previous clients feel ... dis-enfranchised, perhaps? Oh, heck yea. But you know, the newer ones paid the higher prices and were actually much more positive about appreciating my services than the ol' compainers ever had been.
You could easily say I threw away a good chunk of my users. Dang straight, I sure did. Made a temporary dip in the income stream also. But resulted in a much better income stream down the road. Been through this a couple times since. Decided we needed a change in model or pricing structure, or a change in the market we were pursuing.
You must be totally horrified about this. And yea, I could do this at any time to my current clients, couldn't I? Oh ... oops ... I'm adding video capabilities into my product/service list. I'm doing it again!
If ... as you seem SO certain of and horrified about ... Adobe's bottom-line profits dip for a bit, what in the world is it of concern to you? You clearly are shouting you hate them ... the evil money-grubbing secret-stealing hacks! So, I'd think you'd be thrilled to sit back and chuckle about their imminent demise. You KNOW this model can't work and is going to break them.
Or are you really afraid it's going to work out just fine in the end for them? Either way, it will be more amusing to me to listen to the worries, frights, and concerns of the folks screaming of the horrors of the cloud than about anything else out there.
Because no matter what Adobe decides to do at any time, I and the others choosing to utilize their products will always have our own options separate from Adobe. Just as you do. Wow. Did you know there are alternate programs for every single one of the video related programs they have? That many top-line pros actually ... I know this may be a shock ... don't even USE Adobe software.
Go figure ...
Neil
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Neil, I find it ironic that you say I have a "strong emotional reaction" to this issue. If you compare our posts, it's pretty clear which one is using more emotionally loaded language. Hint: Writing words in all caps, using exlamation marks and of course using words like "So flipping WHAT?! ".
I also notice the rather lame debate tactic your try to use, in which you constantly try to bring up how "funny" you find the arguments of your opponents. Too bad that I'm not really interested in what your particular sense of humor deems funny, I'm more interested in the actual arguments and facts. Let's take a look at what, if anything, you have to say as actual arguments.
Oh, yea, I'm SO worried my marketing secrets are SO important they'll be shared by the NSA!
Here your great rebuttal seems to focus on pointing out how unimportant the work you do is. Based on that attitude I'm sure it stays unimportant in the future as well, so I guess you are right about not having to worry about intelligence agensies being interested. So I'm willing to grant you the point that people doing unimportant work, and seeking to do so also in the future, won't have to care as much about industrial spying.
I didn't say anything whatever ... nor imply anything ... that I had ANY emotional attachment to ANY kind of purchase/delivery model.
Your communication style does seem pretty emotionally charged. I would also like to point out that I have nothing against subscriptions if perpetual licences are also offered. When the subscription was voluntary during CS6, I was happy about having that as an option. I'm advocating for choice. I'm not sure why you would consider that to be a bad thing.
But you don't know what they'll (Adobe) be charging in future years!" is such a pile of bunk. YOU don't know what the per-license for anything YOU'VE got will be in several years.
Instead of attacking my argument, you try to make the argument that I won't know the costs either. This is clearly false, since my cost of using my Adobe products is zero dollars for as long as I want. I have perpetual licences.
You apparently are rather unaware of how many people do thoroughly enjoy renting or leasing apartments, houses, and cars.
I would argue most people would rather buy those things than keep renting them year after year. Renting a car for a day? Might be okay. Renting a car every day for 10 years? Doesn't sound very smart to me.
I've rented, owned, and leased all kinds of things. Somehow, I've survived! Amazing, that ... really!
It's not about survival.
Why do you have such a strong emotional reaction to subscrption models?
I have presented you factual arguments, not emotions. Your own post seemed to include a lot of emotionally charged words like:
"humor, worried, TERRIBLE FEAR, humorous, I'll laugh myself silly, Silly argument, Amazing, that ... really! So flipping WHAT?! extreme, quiver in fear, Wow, just bizarre, insulting, I'm not stupid, intimidated, funny, intimidated, fear, sad"
I do find your clear assumption that you've got the FUTURE spelled out so much better than anyone that doesn't agree with you rather insulting to the intelligence and character of all those who don't choose your line of ... reating.
I never said I know the future. But I can make educated guesses based on the facts of the situation and past behavior of Adobe. I can also look at the evidence of NSA spying on foreign companies and acknowledge they seem to have every intention to continue doing that. I recommend you try to not get insulted at someone predicting what the future might bring. Predicting future outcomes is one of the most important skills we humans have.
When any company I deal with changes the "deal", I make decisions and roll with it.
Seems like you cheer for reactionary behavior. I personally don't think that alone is a good enough strategy to deal with the world.
I'm not stupid, vapid, or a dependent child, nor intimidated by anyone. But I do find the whole tenor of this thread funny. Or I wouldn't be bothering with it. I'm certainly not intimidated by the level of reasoning in the arguments here.
You seem to have the need to do a lot of convincing of how un-intimidated you feel.
Living one's life in such fear ... well, it does seem sad, after a while.
I'm sorry to disappoint you but I don't live in fear. That's because I have eliminated the threats that could create fear. For example, I know my most important work is safe from online threats, because my computer doesn't go online. Absolutely no fear there. I also don't enter into business deals that have unpredictable future costs. No fear there either.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
You want a valid poll? You already know about the online petition against CC. This thread is still being discussed how long after CC's released? There are quite a few people in this thread beyond me and "a few others." When online articles popup about CC - scroll down to the comments section - again mostly negative.
Of course.
If you hang out at the monkeys cage...you will find lots of monkeys. If you hang out at in the eagles cage..you will find eagles.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Living one's life in such fear ... well, it does seem sad, after a while.