Re: "Show Older Apps" ... that's a good point. Thanks for the reminder. As for why anybody would keep using Muse. Wow, where to start. Someone above mentioned GoLive and I agree that it was a far more engaging (until its very last version) static website builder than Dreamweaver (at least at the time it was EOL'd). Muse, though it lacked any way to access a code view, was -- OK *is* -- a helluva fun static-website authoring app. Dreamweaver is certainly powerful and could benefit from some more of that Muse / GoLive spirit. BTW, speaking of static websites, say you want to create a complex multi-page how-to including all manner of media and interactivity, you can quickly design/build a website in Muse, export as HTML and throw it up on an Amazon S3 bucket or even send a .zip of it. Static, packaged websites will always have value, whether they're "live" online or not. Muse truly fulfilled its mission of providing powerful controls to create websites with no coding. It deserved better treatment, IMHO.
... View more