I do not believe there is any Adobe curriculum available geared towards administration. But several AATCs have developed their own material. Have a look at http://training.figleaf.com/courses/administering_coldfusion.cfm ... View more

Email address is reset to "Yourself" for me as well whenever I log in to the forums. ... View more

The FAQ used to say you had to call the helpdesk to change the country. You could call and try. ... View more

John Hawkinson wrote: Maybe I should go install Firebug on that machine... That will only help if you keep it open all the time because it start logging when you open it. You could look into https://developer.mozilla.org/en/HTTP_Logging to log everythng your browser does to a text file. Then when you get the problem I would be interested in the log. Just make sure you never give access to that logfile to anybody else and if you send the part with the 400 error that you strip out the cookies. ... View more

INSERT INTO TableA (firstname, lastname .......) SELECT      firstname      , lastname      , ... FROM      TableB WHERE NOT EXISTS (      SELECT *      FROM TableA      WHERE           TableA.firstane = TableB.firstName           AND TableB.lastName = TableA.lastName ) ... View more

Desmond666 wrote on 11/07/29 13:48: I only joined this group two weeks ago. I have signed up to receive emails from 5 threds. Each email tells me how to un-subscribe. Problem is i am receiving emails from everyone on the plannet who has subscribbed to adobe. I get between 300 and 400 emails a day. http://forums.adobe.com/thread/416458 ... View more

The FAQ entry specifically tells you to post both account names. Please do so. ... View more

Lynda Spangler wrote on 11/06/17 07:07: I went to go to a friends site and I was presented with a Threat Message (from AVG) saying that "Threat Detected" This forum is intended for the discussion of the Adobe forums. For your problem you should check if AVG offers forums for help with fixing the issues their problems identify. ... View more

Claudio González wrote: In another thread of this same forum, I posted very recently the following idea -for which I do not claim paternity, as it just unites suggestions from other participants- but it hasn't deserved any response: If it didn't merit a response the first time, why would it merit a response when reposted verbatim? ... View more

I thibk the overhead isn't too bad with the memory filesystem. But you could also use DDX directly. ... View more

Noel Carboni wrote: What an unexpected concept (filling the PM box to prevent people from sending one successfully)!  Are folks doing this trying to be both polite and rude at the same time? If a company has a fax number published, would you it be better for them to leave the fax connected in some broom closet that nobody ever enters without any paper in it, or to just unplug the fax? Obviously the best solution would be to stop advertising the PM functionality for people that do not want to deal with PMs, but in the absence of that option the ability to make sure the sender gets an immediate error is the second best solution. ... View more

Jacob Bugge wrote on 11/05/24 21:46: Those of us taking part in the discussions in the later years of the fair forums, and helping the best we could during the nightmare of the forum changes that were rolled back, made very clear what we meant about the ways the new proposed/planned forums seemed to appear and work. Sure. But that is something else as the opposition to hosting all forums on a common platform that Claudio mentions. There were very few people who felt that it was a good idea to keep the Macromedia, Adobe, InterAkt, Scene7 etc. etc. etc. forums on separate systems. We did that whenever we had the opportunity, in other words, as soon as anything was made known, here in this forum. By the time the move became public knowledge the decision was months old. ... View more

Claudio González wrote on 11/05/24 14:08: Jochem van Dieten wrote : >> As long as people don't have the option to turn off PMs I think the >> current number is too high already. Why? In order to make it clear that PMs will never be read some people fill their entire quota. The bigger the quota, the more work that is. ... View more

Claudio González wrote: And it's also good to remember that many of us expressed very clearly our opposition to a common forum platform for ALL Adobe products Very few people expressed their opposition to a common platform. People just expressed their opposition against this platform. (Which they did about 3 months after the decision was made.) Fortunately, registration in the Adobe site and the Forums site were separated after implementing that common platform... That is not correct. ... View more

adobe-admin wrote on 11/05/23 17:57: What is a good number? As long as people don't have the option to turn off PMs I think the current number is too high already. ... View more

Your account has spawned a new identity: http://forums.adobe.com/people/John%C2%A0Hawkinson-NeAwDp http://forums.adobe.com/people/John%C2%A0Hawkinson See http://forums.adobe.com/thread/613050 and post back if that doesn't solve it. ... View more

John Hawkinson wrote on 11/05/17 14:43: Just got another one of these, for http://forums.adobe.com/message/3682842. What was the exact email address you sent the message to? ... View more

Harbs. wrote on 11/05/12 21:00: Jochem uses it extensively and built an AIR forum client based on it. Jochem, any chance of getting that updated? Last September I had a conf call with Jive about the current state of the REST APIs and their future plans to fix the bugs and document the idiosyncrasies of the REST APIs. I am under NDA so I can't tell you what they told me, but my own conclusion is that an AIR client is just not going to happen for a long time. ... View more

John Hawkinson wrote on 11/05/12 19:31: This is database skew between 1 of the 4 servers. Cache skew, the database is consistent. I hope there are not threads that have different contents on different servers that are not subsets of each other... There are if you use the website or reply by email. Outgoing email notifications are sent after a commit and commits are consistent so they have no problems. The webservices bypass the cache as well and are always consistent. ... View more

John Hawkinson wrote: [can anyone tell me how to talk to specific server nodes to look for data inconsistencies?] You can switch nodes at will by modifying the value of the BIGipServerPool_53_ENT2 cookie. I don't know if they have changed, but n 2009 the names / values were: SGAURWA41P: 706251018.22555.0000 SGAURWA42P: 723028234.22555.0000 SGAURWA43P: 739805450.22555.0000 SGAURWA44P: 756582666.22555.0000 ... View more

John Hawkinson wrote: So basically, all the nodes with proper names do not seem to be syncing up with the 10.137.24.43 node, which is presumably misconfigured anyhow, since it has an RFC1918 address as its nodename intead of a node name. It's also plausibly misconfigured since you would think 43P would be the node ending in .43, so something else is messed up, too. The nodes refer to Tomcat instances of which there are 4. I have only ever seen 2 IP addresses, so I doubt there is a one-on-one correspondence between node names and IP addresses. I'd theorize, then, that if a poster gets load-balanced to the 24.43 server, then his/her posts get tossed into lala land until something happens that forces a database quorum sync? Until cache expiration / resync. There is a single PostgreSQL database but there is a distributed Oracle Coherence cache and I believe every node has its own cache instance. But since there is a single database and that database has proper referential integrity the issues should sort theselves out eventually without data loss or conflicts. ... View more

Noel Carboni wrote on 11/05/11 02:24: Jochem has the words "COMMUNITY PROFESSIONAL" under his name, but (as far as I know) COMMUNITY PROFESSIONALs aren't Adobe employees. I'm not even sure they're privvy to any information beyond what we lowly users get. Community Professionals are under NDA with Adobe and do get some information, such as a heads up on release dates, early access to beta's and bugfixes etc., before the general public gets it. Jochem, do you really know whether the probabiliity of Adobe implementing the anti-spam features we're discussing are indistinguishable from zero - save from their past history of keeping the status quo, which we're all aware of? Do you think Adobe knows themselves? ... View more

Noel Carboni wrote: That struck me as kind of a snide remark. I believe the official term is "Expectation Management". Or does anybody expect Adobe to spend actual money to contract Jive to implement what is being discussed? I sometimes notice people spending a lot of effort on issues where both the cause and the solution are well understood from a technical perspective and the only thing is lacking is the actual implementation of the solution since Adobe doesn't want to invest in the platform. Or spending a lot of time inventing workflows for usability problems where the probability of that workflow being implemented is indistinguishable from zero. Sometimes I will warn people they are wasting their time if they do so for any reason other than their personal entertainment. ... View more

Claudio González wrote on 11/05/08 01:41: Is this worth discussing Not if you do so under the illusion of it ever being implemented. ... View more