• Global community
    • Language:
      • Deutsch
      • English
      • Español
      • Français
      • Português
  • 日本語コミュニティ
    Dedicated community for Japanese speakers
  • 한국 커뮤니티
    Dedicated community for Korean speakers
Exit
9

Generative fill output not good

Community Beginner ,
May 08, 2024 May 08, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I used the generative fill for removing object but the output was worst. It made photo unusable. Few months back it was working pretty good. But now it's output is bad. It's not even looking real.

Bug Unresolved
TOPICS
Imaging , Mobile

Views

229

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
7 Comments
Community Expert ,
May 08, 2024 May 08, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Hello @Watch It37257370ncv3 ,

 

Thank you for your feedback.  I encourage you also to thumbs down results like this and provide feedback:

droopydog500_0-1715165292481.png

droopydog500_1-1715165304692.png

I like to add a note to describe specifically what is wrong.

 

I have noticed myself on generative fill, more generations seem to be required to find the right result with model 3.  Our collective feedback will helpfully provide information to Adobe to adjust the model.

 

Thanks,

 

    droopy

 

 

 

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Beginner ,
May 08, 2024 May 08, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Every result is same for how many results we will keep on doing this

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Expert ,
May 08, 2024 May 08, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Hi @Watch It37257370ncv3 ,

 

One additional tip, try selecting a larger area around what you want to replace.  I am not sure what you are selecting, but if you are selection only the object you want to remove by closely selecting to the edge of that object, the results will be poorer than if you also select around the object as well.  For example if I start with this image and want top change this spot:

droopydog500_0-1715167203177.png

 

Not so good selection:

droopydog500_1-1715167279452.png

 

Better selection:

droopydog500_2-1715167320707.png

 

Result:

droopydog500_3-1715167428655.png

 

I hope this helps.  Let us know if we can help further.

 

    droopy

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Beginner ,
May 08, 2024 May 08, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Yes you are right. But I have been using generative fill for past few months. I have edited photos. I am even them on my Instagram as well. What I meant to say is that the results few months back were good. But now suddenly the results are not the same. 

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Beginner ,
May 08, 2024 May 08, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

 

Take a look at this photo there was  a person sitting on the road but I removed it using generative fill. Look at the results but now it's not the same.

Screenshot_2024-05-08-17-04-39-314_com.instagram.android-edit.jpg

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Expert ,
May 08, 2024 May 08, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

@Watch It37257370ncv3 , in general, I agree the new model has made generative fill harder. It needs some updates. I think Adobe expected that as it is listed as being in "preview".

 

If you need to create better results faster, you might consider using gen fill in Photoshop which I believe still uses model 1 (for now). Photoshop beta is using model 3, so it there is a visible path for Photoshop to be updated.

 

    droopy

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Beginner ,
Jun 02, 2024 Jun 02, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

LATEST

When I used generative fill during the "free" period of unlimited use, the results were actually pretty good!

Ever since it became "paid" and I'm still only using the free 25 credits, the results are mostly poor and out of proportion.

I wonder if it has anything to do with paying for it vs not paying for it?

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report