We have a brand new look! Take a tour with us and explore the latest updates on Adobe Support Community.
Getting blurry or dull images after exporting from Illustrator? Use these simple tricks to save high quality images from Illustrator
For JPEG format, we have these extra options:
Please refer to this help article for more details and other file formats.
Copy link to clipboard
That's a good collection of advice, let me just add 3 things:
Web safe colors stem from the age of 8-bit monitors and limit your choice of color to just 216 bright colors, which won't solve the problem of bad looking text and graphics in JPEGs.
The choice "Type optimized" applies hinting, so the vertical stems of the letters will have the same width and won't be anti-aliased (provided the font designer correctly implemented hinting into the font).
After having exported a PNG, open it in Photoshop and embed the color profile you had as working profile in Illustrator. For the web this likely is sRGB.
Copy link to clipboard
Let me add another thing:
"For actual size choose 72 PPI: If you are exporting an image 1001x1001 Px at 72 PPI, result will be 1001x1001 Pixels, but if we export the similar image with 300 PPI, dimensions of end result will be 4167x4169 Pixels."
That change of dimensions will only happen if the upper left corner X Y values of your object/selection do contain fractions. In your example it would be 4171 X 4171
And it is better to export at multiples of 72 ppi (144, 288) to avoid pixels being added due to anti-aliasing.
Copy link to clipboard
You can also use Export for screen and set the scale to 2x , 3x, ..
Wow, that was so helpful. What did it do differently (as opposed to export for web)?
Copy link to clipboard
Thank you so much Monika, Ton and Mohammad for adding these wonderful suggestions. This will surely help our users.
Thank you so much for the info!!
Why not just drop the illustrator file onto Photoshop? set size etc... easy
I now have spent more time trying to export sharp JPG's (it's what the client insists on having) than on doing the actual design work. I see all kinds of people trying to solve this for what looks like a huge number of people having the same issues. I'm completely exasperated as to why in these days where pretty much all design has to be screen compatible, Adobe is apparently oblivious to what is a huge FAIL. I've been doing this for over 20 years so I'd like to think I know what I'm doing and I don't recall this being an issue in older versions of the software, so I don't accept that this is anything else than Adobe's incompetence. This SHOULD BE EASY. To make matters worse, less experienced designers I know, are able to generate crisp images using new apps I in the past have discounted as silly, which, as you might imagine is just a wee bit embarrassing! I think perhaps I've given too much of my love to Adobe over the years and it's time to dedicate a few days to evaluating alternatives.
Could you perhaps tell us some details of what is working and what is not?
Screenshots help explain the issue.
Hi Monika, Thanks but I've seen you on here in numerous posts trying to solve the problem, unsuccesfuly I'm sorry to say. I'm outta time so going with the "open in Photoshop" workaround, which is beyond ridiculous when you consider how long Adobe's been around and had time to make this obvious requirement easy. I seriously am going to see what else is out there. I'm tired of stupid bells and whistles being added, but basic functions being completely ignored year after year. If there was a simple solution all one would need to say is what everyone is saying, vector art in illustrator is exporting as useless and fuzzy.
"Hi Monika, Thanks but I've seen you on here in numerous posts trying to solve the problem, unsuccesfuly I'm sorry to say. "
So you don't want to discuss your problem, but rather offend the people who are offering help?
I'm sorry, as I said I'm exasperated from banging my head into a brick wall with this, and so I guess I'm venting because I'm hoping that Adobe pays attention to these forums - judging by the sheer number of returns on my search; obviously they don't. Again Sorry and have a great day I did not mean to offend.
I can't speak for MAStephens, but I understand where they're coming from.
I keep having issues with exporting logos as PNGs that aren't clear enough for my client. This is not a case of the client zooming in too far either- even I can see these PNGs are rastery around the edges. I try to google solutions for this and all I ever see is "export the image at 300 ppi".
This is very frustrtaing because I've tried this several times and it does not work. I've tried doubling the image width, exporting at 600 ppi, exporting using "Expot as", "Export for Screens" and the Asset Export window, with Art-Optimized, Type optimized...
The only thing that seems to work is scaling the image in Illustrator at a much larger width/height than it needs to be (possibly 3 or 4 times it's longest dimension, and exporting at a resolution of 300ppi), and then resizing the exported PNG using the bounding box to fit the space it needs to. This leads to me having PNGs with effective resolutions of 1000 ppi sometimes (as seen in the InDesign links panel), but it seems to be the only way to get an actually clear image.
I wll probably end up making a forum post to sot out my issue. I am just frustrated that exporting an image at the industry standard for print resolution doesn't actually produce a print ready image.
I suppose you want to print it in the same quality that you get when printing text from InDesign?
Then place vector artwork. Why do you even export a PNG in order to place that in InDesign?
And yes, when you want to print your graphic (not photo) artwork such as a logo in razor sharp, text like quality, then indeed 300 ppi might be not sufficient. But also: when sending a job to print, what matters is not what you see on screen, but what comes out of the printer.
Also: InDesign might be set up to use the quick preview. Then you always see a low resolution version of placed artwork on screen.
I really need to jump in on this, because, like these designers, I've been on Adobe for 20+ years and have the EXACT same issue. Many times people have put images side by side and they STILL get no answer. Monika, you are not listening to what is being described. I've done many many vectored infographics and they are NEVER EVER SHARP on export to jpg or png. This has been going on for at least a couple years and is a "new" problem in that time. I quit writing because honestly, I have never ever gotten a response that works.
Monika, you are not listening to what is being described.
I have asked for screenshots and still I don't get any examples. So maybe it's not me who is not listening?
And then: this is a user forum. People who are marked as "Staff" are on Adobe's payroll. Everyone else is not. So if you think that Illustrator does not produce the quality you expect, then it's not me who you want to address.
Hey BLH, here's something I do that sometimes works 😉 I create the vector art at the size I need it to be in it's final state. For applications where the client wants a file for their Word or PPT report or such. I use the Save for Web and type in 2000 percent before I save it. Sometimes it accepts the 2000 sometimes it swaps out a number like 1783.654%. Don't ask, no blazing idea. Then I place the file in word for the client file, I make sure that the stupid box in Word file/options/advanced (Windows only) that is set by default to compress imported images, is unchecked. I insert the image and it appears at a smaller size than saved - again no idea - anyway it looks very blury. Then I resize it to exactly the original width it was created, and it crisps right up to at least tolerable levels! For web (by the way I don't know why there's talk of print in this thread because JPG's and PNG's shouldn't even enter the conversation, That's what native Ai's, PDF's, EPS's and even Tif's are for) the same process gets me as close as possible to crisp but the percentage has to be played with, most times double works for me.
These are clunky work arounds I use with existing files that folks need updated etc. When I think of the money I've given Adobe over the years I'm totally annoyed with them. For current stuff I'm teaching myself sketch and quite liking it.
At this risk of being a Johnny come Lately to the discussion, why not save as .svg? You can do this right in IL, and it can be emailed and viewed in any web browser. The recipient will then see exactly what you have done in IL without the inherent fuzziness of a bitmap file. I've done this with very large and complicated .ai files. Not to mention the possiblity of saving the file to your Adobe account and sending a link to the recipient. I've also done this to make high resolution photoshop images available (usually saved as a .tif to be openable in Safari, or possibly in the Windows version of Preview if there is one - I don't know that because I'm many years away from using Windows).
I would add that then the nitty gritty of getting a vector image into suitable shape for the internet can be worked out with the client, or web developer, or whomever. It's never going to be perfectly easy to get a vector image into suitable shape for the web, regardless of the app being used, imho, especially in the age of multiple screen sizes.
Now try to share your SVG on Instagram.
Valid point, but, for my part, I do almost no Instagram or Facebook, mainly because I feel they use all of us more than help us.
Unfortunately I think Instagram accounts for about 70% of the reasons people ask this question.
I have to correct myself -- a .svg or .tif must first be downloaded & then a web browser can open it at full resolution, a more unwieldy process than I represented it to be. Sorry.
This is valuable, so thank you.
Please consider incorporating any suggestions, additions, or corrections in Replies with a shout out to those whose ideas/suggestions you use. Most of us won't read the replies and would like the info, the commentors are made famous by the mentions so won't mind.