I have just installed the 2015 CC edition of Light Room but am having problems publishing and exporting photographs. When either exporting to hard disk or publishing to FlickR, I'm getting 5 or 6 random, all white images.
@richard, so far yes. LR CC with graphics acceleration enabled and CaptureOne seem to process as fast as one another. I am still getting used to the workflow change, however. It is similar, yet quite different.
If you are a fan of tethering, it does work a lot better in CaptureOne. The color reproduction in RAWs is also much better.
Geoff comment is helpful for me. CaptureOne is a similar solution to Lightroom. Lot's of photographer (pro) that I know use it. The only thing that hold me back to switch is the price and I will have to try it...
I really like Lightroom and Photoshop as products but in the last years they have more and more bugs. You can't reach Adobe for bugs in their software and you have to wait for their answer in a forum... for weeks and months. Adobe don't seems to care for their customers.
For me, it's like buying a car and the brakes won't work. If I have to wait 2-3 months to get it fixed (when the car maker will care to answer me), it would be the last car that I purchase from them. You see in real life it happened to me with a brand new Honda (years ago); the problem was fixed in 30 minutes. Problem can happen; it's how the enterprise deal with them that is also important!
Quite large :). When I get home, if you need a number I can get it for you, but lets just say I have not groomed my catalog for 5 years (yes I know, bad buuuuuut meh).
I agree, it's gone on many months and for those of us that use this in a large production environment, changing the usable cores to 1 slows things down tremendously for export. However the mess it creates on having to check 100% of the files is a bigger nightmare. I'd like adobe to address this in a patch instead of us having to wait for a new version.
If you read the comments, the bug has been acknowledged more than a month ago, and the intent is to fix it in the next release. Traditionally releases have been 3-4 months apart.
Acknowledged and confirmed are two different things. If you read through the comments, you'll see that the overall tone of those having to deal with this want a promise and commitment, not an appeasement.
There is an "Acknowledged" status and then an "In Progress" status then a "Solved" status these feedback threads can be flagged with along with "Not a Problem".
Earlier this thread was set to "Acknowledged" which means Adobe has replicated the bug. To me this is the same thing as the word "Confirmed" within the limited words available for thread flagging.
You may notice, now, that the thread status is "In Progress".
Both of these statuses, Acknowledged and In Progress can be implied from Official Representative Rikk Flohr's statements from over a month ago that said he'd reproduced the problem and that it should be fixed in the next release, but sometimes comments can be lost in the volume of replies, so a thread status helps.
Restricting LR to one CPU-thread is the workaround in the mean time.
My point, earlier, was that because Adobe had set the thread status to "Acknowledged" and that Rikk Flohr had said it was logged as a bug and a fix included in the next release, that there wasn't anything more us users needed to do as far as commenting more to get it noticed or increase its fix priority because those things had already been achieved over a month ago.