P: Generated images violate user guidelines

[Hematita]

So as you can see, it's a PG-13 relatively inoffensive image of a woman in a bunny outfit. The top worked fine, and I was able to complete the top ear, which is cool. When I tried to extend the bottom with generative fill, though, I got this warning. They're just a pair of legs wearing stockings, and I wanted to extend it.

It feels like a false flag - though I could be wrong? I find myself thinking it would do the same for women in swimsuits.

Figured I'd share here.

[daniellei4510]

Yes, I highly suspect that the AI bot gives first consideration to the original photo before it starts to rely on the work of others. In that sense, it works like Content Aware Fill.

[kawaki]

V25 is no better. Your community guidelines are too constricting.  Artists are trying to create but are being met with this Adobe ideaology that harkens back to the 1900s.  Open up the boundries, we're all adults here.  Give us a more robust tool OR remove it.  Looking into other platforms that are not baby sitters.

[JR Boulay]

"I put swimsuit tops and bottoms on nude models quite often"

Yes, me too without issues.

[Graham24508943nobd]

Also had no problems dressing nude women. However the silliest violation came up erlier today when I was working on a Christmas fairy for my wifes' christmas cards. For reasons known only to the bot and God, I'd 2 or 3 attempts blocked. There was no bare skin in view, so wonder would it have been the word fairy ?  I changed it to fairie after that and it was fine.

[Kevin Stohlmeyer]

@kawaki what specifically are you being restricted on? What kind of prompts are you using?

[kawaki]

I'm not giving prompts.  I want to continue what I started.  In this case a nude male and a sheet.  Like I said before, we're all adults and should have the creative rules to let generative fill do it's own thing.  The resulta can be surprising. 

[daniellei4510]

When you think a specific word is the issue, it's best to head over to Firefly and try a prompt there with the word in question. If you get a violation response, then it's the word. If not, it was a bug in GF.

[akaBEZ]

Having the same issue in photshop 25 (not beta).
Your tip says that if you want to remove something just don't write any prompt, when I try to remove a table (without any prompt) it says "the images were removed yada yada yada..." the image is of a woman fully clothed, nothing nsfw about it, in a publuc cafe and I am trying to remove a table behind her.
If this is your tip inside Photoshop, why here you suggest to add a prompt?

This is redicoulos, finally you make something amazing (after so many years you stagnated and practicly did nothing ionovotaive in photoshop) but than you add these stupid guidelines. WHY? are you afraid to be held acountable for some nudity or gore? it's not like I can't just use photshop the old fashioned way to make whatever I want, wouldn't you be accountable then?

What kind of an artist tool is that anyway? nudity has been part of the art world for thousdns of years, honsetly every day that go by I am fed up with your corporate BS more and more.

[daniellei4510]

Have you attempted to enter a period (.) as your prompt? This fixes the issue 99% of the time. It's been well documented here. Nudity has nothing to do with it.

[Gregusaurus]

Yes, entering a "." period does fix the guideline error most of the time. What I do not understand is why isn't the period correction just put into the generative code by the engineers who are developing this AI program? Why is it left for us to continue to try to correct this bug? If the period works, why isn't it automatic and behind the scenes?

[daniellei4510]

I wondered that myself in the very beginning. Possibly because if a period were entered automatically, then users who normaly enter an actual prompt would have to remove it each time or enter their cursor in front of it. But just a guess. Meanwhile, keep in mind that a released version doesn't necessary mean that all bugs have been eliminated, but only that it is stable enough to be released into the wild. I'm sure your cell phone and numerous applications on your phone or computer require updating on a frequent bases to eliminate bugs or privacy issues discovered after the public release, sometimes even months later.

[Gregusaurus]

@daniellei4510

To be clear I didn't mean the period should be automatically put into the visable prompt field but put into the code to fix the error message. The user wouldn't see it. 

[daniellei4510]

Yeah, I figured that out after I posted. 🙂 I'm not a programmer by any means, but even if it were possible, it would just be a band-aid and not a solution.

[kawaki]

Okay putting periods in sometimes helps BUT the nudity does matter.  Adobe, please address this issue of censorship.  Please continue your long standing support of open creativity.  We are artists, photographers and creaters.  Please respect that.

[daniellei4510]

As I've mentioned elsewhere, I put clothing (usually swimwear tops and bottoms) on entirely nude models to make them suitable for Facebook (talk about censorship!) and have never had problems. At least none that I couldn't find work-arounds for. If skin or nudity is the cause of any issues, it still to me is the result of a bug.

[kawaki]

No word should be "in question"

[daniellei4510]

Every legitimate AI platform has a banned word list. And always will.

[kawaki]

"legitmate"?   Really?  What is legitmate AI?  There are some very "legitimate" AI engines that allow for creativity without word censorship.  These I will be using rather than Adobe's poor attempt at a narrow market. 

[daniellei4510]

"Legitimate" as in virtually every popular AI platform available today. 

[daniellei4510]

And you are certainly welcome to do so.

[Saiyab325449548gf4]

 Nothing can solve it...😑😑

[CShubert]

@Saiyab325449548gf4 

Adobe has limited access to the generative fill and generative expand features to customers with a valid subscription to a plan that includes Photoshop ( Creative Cloud, Single app or Photography plan).

Potential customers can try Photoshop and the generative features by signing up for a 7 day trial here - https://www.adobe.com/downloads.html 

If you believe that you have are incorrectly receiving the above error and qualify to use the generative features, please contact technical support.

[brombres]

I got this warning pop-up for something innocuous, then it automatically disappeared before I could click on anything. Is there way for me to find that notification again so I can click Request Review? If not I suggest the warnings stay up until an action is chosen.

The new Generative AI is fantastic, BTW. Finally brought be back to Photoshop after all these years. Looking forward to seeing these small bugs get worked out!

[daniellei4510]

To the best of my knowledge, once it's gone, it's gone.

[CSI Productions]

I received an image generated with the iPhone app called MyMood Ai: Avatar Photo Editor. It generates an averaged image based on pictures uploaded. It does an excellent job and even puts the model in various clothes that compliment the subject. Suitable for corporate headshots and they're excellent. As with a lot of AI apps currently available, it screws up the hands and even (occassionally) adds a third arm which is truley bizzare.

All this being said (BTW this is a corporate headshot for my daughter). I wanted to extend the background but it said I didn't have copywrite ownership so it wouldn't allow it. I can do it the old fashioned way - which I did but Gen Fill wouldn't let me.

What I found interesting is the hand had deformed fingers and she liked the photo but the hand looked seriously bad. Gen fill "did" allow me to encircle the arm and with no prompt, replace it with the appropriate background - which it did really well.

I was curious why it wouldn't let be extend the background but it would let me fix the hand. Is this normal?

TY.

R.Cates