Another Poor Quality AI Image (NOT LABELED AS AI)

[BrickelleM]

https://stock.adobe.com/images/free-vector-happy-father-s-day-hand-drawn-lettering-mother-s-day-call...

I have an inkling that their entire account is full of AI images not being labelled as such.

[daniellei4510]

And if you go to this indivdual's start page and scroll down, there seems to be a major problem similars that are said to be seamless in the title. The seams is close, but not close enough.

[BrickelleM]

Another one: https://stock.adobe.com/images/a-mother-s-day-greeting-with-a-circular-text-area-saying-happy-mother...

[BrickelleM]

@Contributor1 

[daniellei4510]

Happy Mather's Daay? And I thought Happy Pather's ay couldn't be beat. 

[BrickelleM]

Seriously!! Who is approving this stuff!? 

[Contributor1]

Hello @BrickelleM, I see the issue you're referencing in 792848119 and 787036976 and I've sent these details to be reviewed internally. Thank you for the report and sorry for the problem with the images.

[husseinf82010762]

I don't know why they take 3 months of reviewing

[BrickelleM]

@Contributor1 

Instead of making a new thread I'm going to continue here.

This account is generating assets with AI and then using Image Trace to vectorize them and not marking them as AI.
https://stock.adobe.com/contributor/211738588/nobel

Examples:
https://stock.adobe.com/images/computer-keyboard-with-stationery-headphones/800047246
look at the feet https://stock.adobe.com/images/successful-startup-team-collaborating-and-planning/794832452
look at the eyes https://stock.adobe.com/contributor/211738588/nobel?asset_id=789991989
arm https://stock.adobe.com/images/calm-woman-relaxing-and-drinking-coffee-peaceful/788301605?prev_url=d...
feet https://stock.adobe.com/images/man-woman-and-cat-sitting-on-the-sofa-with-laptops-v/789996385?prev_u...

So on and so forth. I think that they should still be marked as AI generated even though they've been vectorized. It's misleading.

[Contributor1]

Hello @BrickelleM, I've sent these details to be reviewed internally. Thank you for the report.

[BrickelleM]

Hi, this one is marked as AI but it's nonsense. The hot dog bun is a waffle with a stick in it?!

https://stock.adobe.com/images/hotdog-and-hotdog-cheese-in-waffle-stick-on-white-background/73094638...

[james37884412hlqn]

Har har har...who would pay 79 dollars for that image? It is in the "food" category. Looking at it I would not feed it to cockroaches.

Of course those who go ga-ga over AI will praise it for its...whatever...

[daniellei4510]

I took a look at this contributor's portfolio. Similars galore. How does this stuff get through?

[BrickelleM]

@Contributor1 

[BrickelleM]

Yeah, their whole portfolio is full of issues, as @daniellei4510 pointed out.

Disgusting/scary hand - https://stock.adobe.com/images/making-edible-sugar-flowers-with-powdered-dyes/786103426
Steam coming off the sponge cake - https://stock.adobe.com/images/vanilla-roll-sponge-cake-with-berry-filling-and-coffee/786104627?prev...l

More weird hands:

https://stock.adobe.com/images/cooking-with-plantains-cut-slices-on-a-cutting-boards/786102421

https://stock.adobe.com/images/cooking-with-plantains-cut-slices-on-a-cutting-boards/786102416

This dog has three front paws - https://stock.adobe.com/images/dog-laying-down-on-maple-leaves/763785453

So on & so forth...

@Contributor1 Adobe needs to be more strict when approving AI stock, I don't know how these got approved.

[Contributor1]

Hello @BrickelleM, I've sent these details to be reviewed internally. Thank you for the report and sorry for the problem with the images. I agree the approval of AI images should be more strict, however that is outside my control.

[BrickelleM]

Totally understand it's out of your control, & thank you for sending the details to be reviewed internally.

[Jacinta38276973k3p2]

This is still a problem! I'm attempting to find an image to use and every one I run through the AI checkers from your stock is coming back as AI generated even thought they are not labeled as such. For a paid service it's not good enough. I'm guessing you're relying on people to be honest and self identify their stock? They have every reason NOT to do this so you really should be introducing an automated checker.