• Global community
    • Language:
      • Deutsch
      • English
      • Español
      • Français
      • Português
  • 日本語コミュニティ
    Dedicated community for Japanese speakers
  • 한국 커뮤니티
    Dedicated community for Korean speakers
Exit
0

Adobe says this is overexposed

New Here ,
Jan 14, 2019 Jan 14, 2019

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

adobe rejected a batch of pictures with a purposely white background, even though they approved others with the same, as being over exposed. I disagree that they are over exposed and so does the histogram In Lightroom. Any suggestions?

TOPICS
Contributor critique

Views

335

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines

correct answers 1 Correct answer

Community Expert , Jan 15, 2019 Jan 15, 2019

Actually, your image could be said to be a tad overexposed.

Annotation 2019-01-15 histogram one.jpg

The pixels are a bit too piled up on the right...

So, bring back the exposure a bit and adjust the curves a bit to get some more detail in the dinosaur...(I used Camera Raw Filter in Adobeshop)

20190111-LPM08815exposure.jpg

and the resulting histogram...

Annotation 2019-01-15 histogram two.jpg

Not a big difference...

But just maybe the reviewers might like all of the dinosaur to be in focus, so there just might be a problem with focus issues...

Adobe is picky...

Votes

Translate

Translate
Community Expert ,
Jan 14, 2019 Jan 14, 2019

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Having a picture approved with one stock provider does not qualify for every stock provider. Adobe is known for being very picky on quality. I have some pictures in competitors portfolio that got refused here. Good for me, less for the customer, as I need to agree with some of Adobe’s critique....

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Jan 14, 2019 Jan 14, 2019

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Hi shawnip,

Are you sure the rejection just said overexposed? Or did it say Over or Underexpose?

Why don't you upload one of those images to this forum so that we can have a look at it, then we can provide a better answer for you?

Regards

JG

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
New Here ,
Jan 15, 2019 Jan 15, 2019

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I though I posted a photo in the original post but it seems to have disappeared. It does not specifically say overexposed but it is obviously not under exposed.20190111-LPM08815.jpg

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Jan 15, 2019 Jan 15, 2019

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Actually, your image could be said to be a tad overexposed.

Annotation 2019-01-15 histogram one.jpg

The pixels are a bit too piled up on the right...

So, bring back the exposure a bit and adjust the curves a bit to get some more detail in the dinosaur...(I used Camera Raw Filter in Adobeshop)

20190111-LPM08815exposure.jpg

and the resulting histogram...

Annotation 2019-01-15 histogram two.jpg

Not a big difference...

But just maybe the reviewers might like all of the dinosaur to be in focus, so there just might be a problem with focus issues...

Adobe is picky...

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Advisor ,
Jan 15, 2019 Jan 15, 2019

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Yes ricky336, focus was my first consideration. Lower half and tail of the beast were blurred. Best regards, JH

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Jan 15, 2019 Jan 15, 2019

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

LATEST

Hi shawnip

I agree with Ricky's analysis of the focus. Your main subject should all be sharp. This is important for cropping. In the case of exposure, yes as is brought out your histogram is showing too much to the right. However, there are times the rejection on exposure is due to the dark, and shadow areas being too dark. Therefore you need to pay attention to this also.

Regards

JG

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines