• Global community
    • Language:
      • Deutsch
      • English
      • Español
      • Français
      • Português
  • 日本語コミュニティ
    Dedicated community for Japanese speakers
  • 한국 커뮤니티
    Dedicated community for Korean speakers
Exit
0

Intellectual Property violation

New Here ,
Feb 26, 2018 Feb 26, 2018

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I don't understand how this image is a violation of intellectual property.  I found a handful of similar images in Adobe Stock taken from the same location.  How is it different?

London Eye 1.jpg

TOPICS
Contributors

Views

310

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines

correct answers 1 Correct answer

Community Expert , Feb 27, 2018 Feb 27, 2018

The London Eye comes under Property Rights as it is rather prominent in the picture and not really part of the cityscape. That is why it wasn't accepted. You would need a property release form.

Known image restrictions

Have a look at the known image restrictions.

Votes

Translate

Translate
Community Expert ,
Feb 27, 2018 Feb 27, 2018

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

LATEST

The London Eye comes under Property Rights as it is rather prominent in the picture and not really part of the cityscape. That is why it wasn't accepted. You would need a property release form.

Known image restrictions

Have a look at the known image restrictions.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines