My Non-AI image was rejected for being Generative AI

[kevinm79623469]

So I uploaded an image I took with the telescope I use in an observatory.  It was rejected becuase they believe it is generative AI.  It took me 30 hours to collect the data for that image and I can say with certainty that it is not generative AI!  So how do I convince Adobe?

[daniellei4510]

Maybe it's just me, but your image wouldn't load.

[Abambo]

It loads for me.

[RALPH_L · Accepted solution]

That happens to me every now and then. Unfortunately there is no way to contest a refusal.

Sometimes, the refusal reason is incorrect. It may be "quality" issues.

I would add some contrast and maybe sharpen a little then resubmit.

[Abambo]

Your asset has been refused for being non-compliant: NON-COMPLIANT IMAGE. There are multiple reasons for getting this refusal. It's not only having uploaded an unmarked generative AI asset. 

What were your title and keywords?

If you are new to stock, you should consider these resources: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/tutorials.html
Please read the contributor user manual for more information on Adobe stock contributions: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html
See here for rejection reasons: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
and especially quality and technical issues: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html

[Abambo · Accepted solution]

Your asset is underexposed noisy and not sharp. The blacks are not deep dark, either light grey. It's an impressive asset, if you can find out how to address the flaws, it will make a nice addition to your portfolio.

[ricky336 · Accepted solution]

Hello,

Look at your keywords a bit more. Many times there can be a prolem there.

As for you photo, it's flat. You could make it 'pop' a lot more - deeper blacks for example. E,g.

[Abambo · Accepted solution]

OK, I learned now (because people posted the correct refusal reason) that there is a really new refusal reason, that says, “Missing Generative AI Flag”. Is that the refusal you got, or is it NON-COMPLIANT IMAGE?

[kevinm79623469]

Yes, it said missing generate AI flag.  We didn't get to the dismissal due to it being an awful image yet. 

[Abambo]

Oh, it's a great image, with quality issues. I'm not sure, if all could be addressed by editing, but you could try.

It seems to be a new sport by Adobe moderators to mark anything with this “Missing Generative AI Flag”.

[ricky336 · Accepted solution]

Due to the fact there are probably a tsunami of AI images now, way more than digital. The floodgates are wide open!!

[Abambo]

If you want to know about Best AI Tools then you can enjoy it by clicking on this link .

By @VAANI37157508ahij

You want to get banned as a spammer, because of your link!

[Nancy OShea]

It was rejected for non-compliance.

Read your Stock Contributor User Guide for more details.

• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html

Hope that helps.

[Abambo]

No, @Nancy OShea, Adobe added a new refusal: “Missing Generative AI Flag”.