Copy link to clipboard
Copied
1 Correct answer
- The bird is missing structure. The completely white feathers probably fooled the camera and post-processing.
- The feet need to be completely in frame. Quite difficult to correct now.
- Cut of the structure at the right. It makes the picture badly framed. Easy to correct.
- The angel figure is touching the border. Make sure that there is some room above, as this makes your picture badly framed. It's correctable but not ideal.
DSCN3039.JPG: Was an easy and fast reject. Did you ever lo
...Copy link to clipboard
Copied
- The bird is missing structure. The completely white feathers probably fooled the camera and post-processing.
- The feet need to be completely in frame. Quite difficult to correct now.
- Cut of the structure at the right. It makes the picture badly framed. Easy to correct.
- The angel figure is touching the border. Make sure that there is some room above, as this makes your picture badly framed. It's correctable but not ideal.
DSCN3039.JPG: Was an easy and fast reject. Did you ever look at this picture at 100%? There is nothing in focus on that picture.
DSCN3018.JPG: Also not sharp. The bird shows no details (would probably not, even if sharp) as it is overexposed. Straighten the image (not that I think that with straitening and resubmitting you were done. The image is irrecoverable, but the bird should stand straight).
DSCN3048.JPG: washed out structures in the feathers.
Optical aberration between the bird and the background!
DSCN3047: idem
DSCN3047: washed out colours, over exposed. If the picture were more detailed (first point), you would probably need model releases.

