1 Correct answer
Adobe Community Professional
,
Apr 06, 2021
DSCN3044.JPG: The bird is missing structure. The completely white feathers probably fooled the camera and post-processing. The feet need to be completely in frame. Quite difficult to correct now. Cut of the structure at the right. It makes the picture badly framed. Easy to correct. The angel figure is touching the border. Make sure that there is some room above, as this makes your picture badly framed. It's correctable but not ideal. DSCN3039.JPG: Was an easy and fast reject. Did you ever...
1
Reply
1
1
Reply
- The bird is missing structure. The completely white feathers probably fooled the camera and post-processing.
- The feet need to be completely in frame. Quite difficult to correct now.
- Cut of the structure at the right. It makes the picture badly framed. Easy to correct.
- The angel figure is touching the border. Make sure that there is some room above, as this makes your picture badly framed. It's correctable but not ideal.
DSCN3039.JPG: Was an easy and fast reject. Did you ever look at this picture at 100%? There is nothing in focus on that picture.
DSCN3018.JPG: Also not sharp. The bird shows no details (would probably not, even if sharp) as it is overexposed. Straighten the image (not that I think that with straitening and resubmitting you were done. The image is irrecoverable, but the bird should stand straight).
DSCN3048.JPG: washed out structures in the feathers.
Optical aberration between the bird and the background!
DSCN3047: idem
DSCN3047: washed out colours, over exposed. If the picture were more detailed (first point), you would probably need model releases.
AdChoices
