Hi @anjeje  The depth of field is too shallow and so did not include the outside elements. The picture is also noisy. See attached image. Best wishes Jacquelin ... View more

Hi @Abrar_Tabish9348  Unfortunately there's nothing we can do to assist you because we're also contributors. Since you've sent your appeal, there's nothing else to do but wait for a response. This may take several months. We cannot say about your case, but there are reports of contributors accounts being restored minus the offending sale royalty after the investigation is done. However, the converse is also true in many cases. Your account being restored depends on the outcome of the investigation.   Best wishes Jacquelin   ... View more

Hi @passegua  This is the complete link without the country code -  https://helpx.adobe.com/id_id/stock/contributor/help/similar-vs-spamming.html   Best wishes Jacquelin ... View more

You're welcome @Nausheen Talha  Best wishes Jacquelin   ... View more

Hi @KarlitoArt  I read what it said and ignore it thereafter. It's not a bother to me. Best wishes Jacquelin ... View more

Hi @Moonlander67  File ending with 603 has either a camera shake or subject shake due to wind. The other 2 file have blurred elements in the forefront. See attached screenshot images. Best wishes Jacquelin ... View more

Hi @Nausheen Talha  I had the issue. What I did was to follow the instruction to connect. You already have a Payoneer account, so you sign in to Payoneer instead of creating an account. Once you sign in from the Adobe platform, you should be good. I believe Adobe did some updates that causes the disconnection from their end. Best Wishes Jacquelin ... View more

Hi @Daffodils 1  The first and last images have what appears to be compression noise around the edges. The forefront of the first photo is out of focus. You need to capture what's in the forefront with a camera depth of field settings that will capture your entire subject in sharp focus.  The butterfly is not completely sharp. Best wishes Jacquelin ... View more

Hi @Jurgen283874398vjb  This is supposed to be a confidential mission that you need to read the instructions and guidelines carefully, following everything in its entirety. Anything you do not understand, there is a contact information that you use to contact Adobe about it. Best wishes Jacquelin ... View more

Hi @Delower Stock , I suggest you read carefully what you're agreeing to. The document that you're asked to agree to before finalizing the nomination process would have all the applicable details and would say if the assets are exclusive or not. I do not have that information at this time since my batch has already been processed.  Best wishes Jacquelin ... View more

Hi @ZALEZPHOTO , Thank you for ultimately highlighting the change. Initially, In the contributor help, under the question,  ❝What is the difference between the Annual and Perpetual Free Collection nomination options?❞ was the answer below "Perpetual": “If your asset is selected for the Perpetual Free Collection, it must remain exclusive to Adobe Stock. You cannot license it on other platforms or sites.” This information seem to have been removed and replaced with "Perpetual term: If any of your opted-in assets get selected, they will be added to the free collection for perpetual use. Once in the free collection, those assets won’t earn any additional royalties (since you will already have received the one-time payment per asset). The perpetual term and one-time payment will grant Adobe Stock the ability to keep the asset in the Free Collection indefinitely without subsequent payments." This amendment would have been in line with having us retaining the rights to all our assets. However, I was just advised that the old clause might still be on the non-public agreement, so be sure to read it before finalizing your nomination. Thanks again. Best wishes Jacquelin   ... View more

Hi @Ataur Shanto , There are known compatibility issues with users in Bangladesh. You need to use the contact us link on your page to contact Adobe and explain your issue in details so that thy can help with a resolution. Best wishes Jacquelin ... View more

Hi @Mobarok Hsn , It's up to you. You have to decide.  If you choose to select both and Adobe selects assets from among them for the perpetual collection, you will need to remove those from all other platforms. Therefore, whatever one-time payment Adobe gives you now is the total value you will get for each of those files. Since the files Adobe select are files that customers are licensing, you have to be comfortable selling your files for the amount Adobe offer while otherwise the value limitlessly increases with each licensing across platforms. We cannot help you with that decision. Best wishes Jacquelin ... View more

Hi @Solvyn  I believe the side of the clipboard should be connected. The second image has motion blur, and a shallow depth of field. It's also under exposed. The fourth image also has a shallow depth of field. Best wishes Jacquelin     ... View more

Hi @abdullahart , I believe the center  floating element of the first image should be supported by something. The lines of this other element is not closed. The second file seem to have fragmented elements. The third the mouth of one of the model of the 3rd file seem odd. Also there are lines that are not closed. The fourth file has lines that are not closed. You need to zoom in on your files to examine them before submitting. Also you need to use the layer's panel to search for fragments. Best wishes Jacquelin           ... View more

Hi @Ataur Shanto  is your country Pakistan? If not, which country is it? Best wishes Jacquelin ... View more

Hi @Delower Stock , You need to read the agreement carefully and make the decision you are comfortable with. You need to understand that those selected for perpetual free collection are exclusive and must not be otherwise licensed. The amount Adobe pays you for for those selected for Perpetual Free collection will be the ultimate value of your work. Once both buttons can actively turn on at the same time, there should not be a problem selecting both collections option for all your assets. Regards Jacquelin ... View more

Hi @jia1674 , The first image seem to be highly compressed. The quality of what you post here is extremely poor when zoomed. I am assuming the second photo is an image of "The Wave in northern Arizona". If I am correct, the following is my IP findings:  Visitors with a recreation permit can take photographs of The Wave for commercial purposes, including licensing them on stock photo sites, without an additional permit, provided they meet specific criteria. The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) oversees the Vermilion Cliffs Wilderness, where The Wave is located, and differentiates between recreational and commercial photography.  Key regulations for commercial photography "De minimis" activity does not require a separate permit. A 2025 law, the EXPLORE Act, significantly changed the rules for photography on federal lands, including those managed by the BLM. A separate permit is not required if the activity meets all of the following conditions: Involves eight or fewer people. Uses only handheld equipment. Takes place in an area open to the public. Does not require exclusive use of a site. Does not adversely affect resources, values, or other visitors. Does not result in additional administrative costs for the BLM. Making money does not automatically trigger permit requirements. The law specifies that receiving monetary compensation does not, in itself, affect the permissibility of filming or still photography. Permits are required for larger-scale commercial productions. A separate, more detailed permit is needed if the photography activity exceeds the "de minimis" criteria. This includes using models, sets, or props, or requiring a large crew or specialized equipment.  Implications for licensing photos of The Wave For a visitor who secured a standard recreational permit to visit The Wave, licensing their photos on a stock photo site like Adobe Stock or Shutterstock is typically acceptable, as long as the photography itself remained within the "de minimis" activity guidelines.  However, anyone intending a larger-scale commercial shoot (e.g., with a group of people acting as models or using significant equipment) must contact the local BLM field office to apply for a separate commercial use permit.  Disclaimer: These regulations can be complex and may be subject to interpretation. Any commercial photographer should confirm the latest rules and their specific situation by contacting the BLM's Paria River District Office. I'ts a beautiful file, and I'm sorry to know that Adobe give you an IP refusal for that image. Best wishes Jacquelin     ... View more

Hi @MD BELLAL , Although I do not see your assets, judging from your description, I believe you are genuinely submitting similar assets. Here's a thread that shows some examples of similar assets. Please note that different colors do not qualify your assets as being similar with something different to offer. Best wishes Jacquelin ... View more

Hi @Александр21775853b34m , This looks like a poorly cropped png file. The edges do not appear to be smooth. Best wishes Jacquelin ... View more

Hi @cs.istvan , You need to zoom in on you images to between 100 and 200% to inspect them for issues.  The first image has noise grains, color noise, color fringing, is under exposed and the perspective needs correcting.  Your colors should be smooth. The second file is also noisy, not sharp on the edges and has a green tint. The third photo has too much of a high highlights and also has color fringing. The fourth photo is underexposed and details are lost in the shadows. Tone done the exposure of the fifth image a bit. The sixth photo has blur caused by either camera shake of slow shutter speed on a windy day. Best wishes Jacquelin         ... View more

Hi @maria_6953 , Create a new post to submit about 3 of your submission. We will help you to find the issues so that you can make correction where possible for resubmission. Best wishes Jacquelin ... View more

Hi @irobinislam  When you did the withdraw request there was a pop-up at the end of your request that told you how many working days maximum you needed to wait. It should be 10 working days. Adobe admin does not work on a week-end. Therefore, it should be after 14 calendar days that you become concerned. In your case you should be paid by October 2, 2025. So, for now, you wait. Best wishes Jacquelin ... View more

Hi @davidr43518242 ,  The reviewers seem to be arbitrarily refusing assets. You do not have to submit a similar asset to get a similar refusal. I suspect the same thing is happening with many of the other refusals. My correspondence with Adobe seem to be monitored by a machine that gives the same response for each reply I send. I don't think anyone is monitoring these correspondences. If that was the case we'd have received a message with an update. It is an unfortunate situation. Best wishes Jacquelin ... View more

Hi @Raul Ceron, So, targeting and refusing all I submit to this platform "is part of (your) ongoing effort to maintain the relevancy and discoverability of content within the Adobe Stock collection"? First off you started to refuse all my photos, no matter what I do they're refused. So, I start submitting vectors only to receive a similar refusal that no other is in my portfolio. I send a ticket to ask what is it that the refused asset is similar to, but received two generic responses that do not answer my question. Contributors have been complaining that they are not submitting similar assets, but getting similar refusals. Did you investigate any of these cases to find out if it's true? I submitted a magnetite chemical molecular structure diagram. It was refused for similar. I have absolutely none other in my portfolio? This is what I found on your website: One molecular diagram asset incorrectly labeled as magnetite. This is in fact showing molecular structure of two compounds. This is no way near to what I did. I created a single molecule that looks totally different from this. So, is it a case you're going off caption? If so are you saying is only one of any subject that must be on the platform and it's the lucky winner that will get the chance to have that subject licensed? Or is it that only certain category of contributors will be allowed to submit to Adobe stock, so you frustrate who you don't want with similar or quality refusals until they get the message and move on? Or, is it a case of overworked reviewers who decide that their pay is too small for the amount of work they have to do, and the only way to maximize pay is to unscrupulous do mass refusals, since the mass acceptance will not work as they wish? You are a staff member, so tell us what's the case. Regards Jacquelin   ... View more

Most definately reviewers are using the similar refusals to reject images for no just cause. Files are being refused for similar for what is not close to or alike what the contributor submitted. Not withstanding the unreasonableness of expecting contributors to search the platform of billions of image to find out if what they are submitting is submitted already, contributors are given similar refusals for images that are not on the platform, nor in their portfolio. Here's one example: Magnetite This is the only chemical molecular structure diagram of magnetite that I found. To the best of my knowledge, this diagram is incorrect. I submitted one diagram that is totally different from this and it was refused for similar. The big question is, "Why are the reviewers engaging in this kind of refusal?" Best wishes Jacquelin       ... View more

Hi @Abambo , As I said I recognize it as a traidmark. I've been around a long time. I have never left my country and have seen that lion on something other than the computer. I just cant place my finger on it at this time.    Anyway on the subject of similar, There's someone or a number of reviewers that are definately refusing files for similar where there's no similar. Regards Jacquelin ... View more

Hi @menaka_8390 , Is this one of a series of images with the same elements. If yes, you might have submitted one or more images that are close to this one. Best wishes Jacquelin ... View more

Hi @ritaroy12 , These are nice muffins. However, the kisses chocolates are trademarked.  Best wishes Jacquelin ... View more