Skip to main content
Participating Frequently
April 10, 2023
Open for Voting

Image sequence renders should be numbered based on the number of the frame you start at.

  • April 10, 2023
  • 9 replies
  • 421 views

Why does AME always start an image sequence render at 0000, even if I'm starting the render at a different number? For example, if I need to resume a render at frame 1000 due to a computer crash, the new render starting at frame 1000 will be named frame 0000, requiring me to manually rename the frames to start from 1000. This can overwrite good frames that were already rendered. Unlike After Effects, which names frames correctly based on the timeline frame number, AME always starts the sequence at 0000, regardless of where the render starts from.

9 replies

SunBronxAuthor
Participating Frequently
April 19, 2023

Much appreciated!

Adobe Employee
April 19, 2023

Got it. Feature request is recorded.

SunBronxAuthor
Participating Frequently
April 18, 2023

I don't have an issue renaming and saving in another folder. I learnt that the hard way once, and never make that mistake anymore. I use a program to rename the files. That is the annoying part though. I would rather AME just works how it does in AE and names the files based on the number it actually is in the timeline and not reset to 0000 every time you render from any part in the timeline...

Adobe Employee
April 18, 2023

There is an even easier way: using Adobe Bridge's batch rename feature:

Adobe Employee
April 15, 2023

You could work on the resulting files and rename them, e.g. like here:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/63161282/batch-rename-multiple-files-to-sequential-numbers

I'd recommend creating a copy of the image sequence in a separate folder for your experiments.

SunBronxAuthor
Participating Frequently
April 14, 2023

How would I go about writing a script? And how would this script work, in Media Encoder? I've heard of scripts for AE but not for AME.

Adobe Employee
April 12, 2023

You may want to create a small script for that in the meantime.

SunBronxAuthor
Participating Frequently
April 11, 2023

Thank you! Looking fwd to not having to manually rename 3000 frames and move them from a secondary folder!

Adobe Employee
April 11, 2023

I have added a feature request for that. Thanks!