Kath-H wrote: adbecare@adobe.com ? Really? Dropped the first letter by  mistake... 'b'... ... View more

jochemd wrote: He is. He posted in the Photoshop SDK forum, then waited a day and came   back to continue here. Had he responded immediately when he started the new thread and just said thank you, there would have been no reason to lock. All he said was he'd posted there and there was no reply yet.http://forums.adobe.com/message/2212289#2212289 That is by no means an attempt to carry on. Just a polite gesture keeping this thread and forum (John T probably in this case), informed that he had followed the advice. And in the event, you chose to lock the thread, for reasons as you say: Everybody can follow the link to the Photoshop SDK forum and help him there. Then out of sheer politeness you should have provided the link to his post in that forum before locking the thread. ... View more

Buko. wrote: Why am I still here? Well its that watching a train wreck thing. Me too... Kind of sick fascination huh? ... View more

jochemd wrote: Jochem -- Jochem van Dieten http://jochem.vandieten.net/ Oh... Go away... ... View more

jochemd wrote: That is in the Forum FAQ http://forums.adobe.com/thread/433723?tstart=0 and in messages from JC and kanguyen: http://forums.adobe.com/message/2007908#2007908 http://forums.adobe.com/message/1962954#1962954 Quite... And have you checked the date on those posts? And do you know what today's date is? ... View more

Well, it's all double-Dutch, jive-speak anyway... In effect, logins are a PIA, which is not the scene with any other forums i visit... the ones you visit that log you out every 20 mins as you say, is no excuse for these... speed is another major issue... and this last post nonsense instead of taking you to the last read post. The list goes on but as you are justifying or rationalising all this mediocre jive excreta, there's no point going on about it. PS: And are you allowed to post personal data in your posts? ... View more

Mmm... just saw where it is... but it's not common across all forums... ... View more

Ildhund wrote: Am I the only one here to think "What letter"? If not, here it is: http://www.adobe.com/support/pdfs/open_letter_to_adobe_customers.pdf That file's properties are pretty revealing. Noel No you weren't the only one ... thanks for the link. Why are the file's properties revealing? What am i missing? TIA, JJ ... View more

I give up... the whole exercise is pointless... ... View more

The replies from the moderators in this thread verge on the surreal! I have never, ever seen such fancy side-stepping, ducking of issues, half promises and inferences all wrapped in a complete but drifting coat of vapour. Jive = Joke Adobe = ?! Let's not get into details, shall we? ... View more

Please intervene where required... needless help is no help... this thread should give you enough clues on that issue... for the rest, 'silence is golden'... ... View more

Curt Wrigley wrote: So you are suggesting its wrong to move threads when they are in the wrong forum? The premiere thread I moved to the premiere forum where it belongs.  I PMd the OP with a link to its new location. You're being over helpful where it's not called for. You could see there was already a post redirecting the OP. There was absolutely no need for you to butt in and add to the confusion. as it occurred to you that people will access that thread with the post redirecting to the same forum and wonder what the hell is going on? Has it occured to you that the others who saw the reply to the OP may wonder why the thread vanished? The answer is no. Because there's no thought from your end.. just a knee-jerk reaction where it's not called for. As a moderator, perhaps your time would be better served by telling Adobe how the present forums stink and how they're losing regulars... the ones who are the serious contributors. But will you do that? No... you're happy running around, deleting threads and posts, moving posts aimlessly and replying with completely meaningless statements as in your replies in either the 'Joke...' or '14 posts...' threads. Please do not take this post as abuse aimed at you personally. It is a critique of the large number of moderators floating around nowadays. ... View more

Claudio González wrote: I think that the usual way of politely telling poor lost souls were to post is a simpler and quite less confusing way of dealing with these problems. Quite However, doubt if those are the objectives... ... View more

Ozzwoman9 wrote: I thought someone mentioned that the posts are 'copied' for a while before it actually gets moved into the correct forum I know I have seen several posts that were showing both here and in their appropriate forum for a while before it was 'fixed'. It's reached the stage where they don't even know what they're doing any longer...  ... View more

Ansury wrote: Surely you mean before the blitzkrieg? That was German... ... View more

John Joslin wrote: I don't know what's worse – the former frivolities or the silent censor. Maybe they're regrouping... or 're-orging' as one of them said ... IOW, the quiet before the storm! ... View more

Claudio González wrote: At the time of writing this message, this thread is shown as having 25 answers and it ends with message #25, so the bug I reported was in my imagination. Also, the "Joke..." thread is shown as having 44 answers and it ends with message #44, so there are no missing or deleted messages. I apologize for my mistakes. No need to apologise... you were absolutely correct. However, the thought police have now got smart... they've reset the total number of posts. At, one time i counted 55 replies in the "Joke.." thread and with only 40 posts showing up. i posted somewhere to this effect... Maybe even in a new thread that's been deleted. ... View more

John T Smith wrote: My guess would be misspelled reorganize i like re-orging better... seems more apt ... View more

John T Smith wrote: Well, in the several years I've been reading in the various Premiere forums, I do remember a "few" (2 or 3?) questions that were specific to porn production... but I don't think that's what he meant Mmmm... so, what do you think he meant? ... View more

Curt Wrigley wrote: I didnt bother moving this cause I think the question was answered fine here.  Its not really a product question, its a "wheres" the forum question as a result of the Pr team re-orging the premiere area a while back. "re-orging"???? Anything to do with 'orgies'? Very confused... ... View more