P2000 - gtx1660ti

Forum|Forum|6 years ago
July 12, 2019
1 reply
674 views

someone could help me a little, I'm going to change my equipment, and I'm thinking of an AMD 7 2700x ryzen and 32 ram, the video card I'm still in doubt, if I buy a 1660ti or a P2000 that in view of its prices are more or less in my budget. Thanks in advance

This topic has been closed for replies.

R

RjL190365

Legend

Go for the GTX 1660 Ti, in this case:

Not only does the Quadro P2000 cost more money than the GTX 1660 Ti, but it is also weaker than even a GTX 1060, which itself is significantly weaker than the GTX 1660 Ti. In fact, the P2000 is a cut-down version of the GTX 1060 6 GB, with only a 160-bit memory bandwidth instead of the full 192-bit memory bandwidth of the GTX's mentioned above.

lagrecafilmsAuthor

Participant

Thank you very much for your contribution, I really need to clarify this doubt, as there are forums that say that Mara work the P2000 and since I do not want it for games, I want it for a much faster render.
very grateful for your contribution, it served me a lot.

R

RjL190365

Legend

No problem.

With the impending EOL of Kepler support by NVIDIA, Adobe has expanded the recommended CUDA GPU list all the way down to the GTX 1650 as of 13.1.3. In addition, the recommended CUDA list now also includes the GTX 1060, the GTX 1660, the GTX 1660 Ti and the RTX 2060 (in addition to the GTX 1070, GTX 1080, GTX 1080 Ti, RTX 2070, RTX 2080 and RTX 2080 Ti that were added to the list a few months ago). Plus, three old Maxwell-generation GeForces were now added: GTX 970, GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti, along with a slew of Maxwell-based Quadros. So now, there is no excuse to not get at least a mid-range NVIDIA GPU if you're going to run Premiere Pro regularly.

Sign up

To post, reply, or follow discussions, please sign in with your Adobe ID.

Sign in to Adobe Community

To post, reply, or follow discussions, please sign in with your Adobe ID.

Scanning file for viruses.

This file cannot be downloaded