Skip to main content
S
Sason922
Known Participant
April 27, 2013
解決済み

General Optimization

  • April 27, 2013
  • 返信数 1.
  • 897 ビュー

Hi everyone!

I have some questions about genral code optimization, i'll demonstreate using examples below:

1) is it better to use:      for(i  = 0 ; i < Array.length ; i++)

                                   {

                                       code...

                                   }

or:

                                         length = Array.length                   

                                        for(i  = 0 ; i < length  ; i++)

                                        {

                                            code...

                                        }

2) is it better to use : for (i = 0 ; i < NUM  ; i++)

                                  {

                                        if (tempArray.property == something)

                                             {

                                                  code...

                                             }

                                        }

or:                                  for (i = 0 ; i  <NUM  ; i++)

                                  {

                                        tempVar = tempArray

                                        if (tempVar.property == something)

                                             {

                                                  code...

                                             }

                                        }

3)(maybe somilar to 2..)  is it better to use: for (i = 0 ; i < NUM : i ++)

                                                                 {

                                                                 array = new object(....)

                                                                 }

or:                                                             for (i = 0 ; i < NUM : i ++)

                                                                 {

                                                                 tempObject =  new object(....)

                                                                 array = tempObject

                                                                 }

I have more questions like that, but answering those should get me started...

Also, is there aby fomral Adobe documentation regarding these things? I couldn'y find any...So if someone could refer me to such (if exists), I'd be thankful.

(Edit: by preformance I mean RAM usage and calculaton time - I'm developing for mobile so these are crucial)

Thank you!

このトピックへの返信は締め切られました。
解決に役立った回答 kglad

this is from the optimization chapter in a book i wrote:

For-Loops , While-Loops and Do-Loops

The bottom line on fast-executing loops in Flash is reverse for-loops are the fastest.  If a stored list of same-type objects is needed in the loop, a reverse for-loop using a vector to reference the list of objects is fastest.

All three loops execute faster if you use an int for the iteration parameter than if you use a uint. All three loops execute faster if you decrement the loop variable, rather than increment it.  (Note: if you decrement a loop variable i and use i>=0 as the terminal condition, you will trigger an endless loop if i is a uint.)

  All three loops execute faster if you use a variable or constant for the terminal condition rather than an expression or object property. 

返信数 1

kglad
Community Expert
kgladCommunity Expert解決！
Community Expert
April 27, 2013

this is from the optimization chapter in a book i wrote:

For-Loops , While-Loops and Do-Loops

The bottom line on fast-executing loops in Flash is reverse for-loops are the fastest.  If a stored list of same-type objects is needed in the loop, a reverse for-loop using a vector to reference the list of objects is fastest.

All three loops execute faster if you use an int for the iteration parameter than if you use a uint. All three loops execute faster if you decrement the loop variable, rather than increment it.  (Note: if you decrement a loop variable i and use i>=0 as the terminal condition, you will trigger an endless loop if i is a uint.)

  All three loops execute faster if you use a variable or constant for the terminal condition rather than an expression or object property. 

S
Sason922作成者
Known Participant
April 27, 2013

Thank you kglad.

So that covers 1 & 2. What about num 3?

Also , is there an Adobe document for those thing? I get a feeling I'm going to run into many more of these little quirks, and I guess it would be better if I could answer my own questions

kglad
Community Expert
kgladCommunity Expert
Community Expert
April 27, 2013

the first is slightly faster when tested just now on my computer.  but it's not likely to be something that would be a factor under real-world situations. and, that may change when run in a different flash player version (though it makes some sense and there's reason to believe the results would be consistant across all flash players because there's an extra step in the 2nd code snippet).

also, there's a lot of mis-information on the internet about what's efficient and what's not efficient.  in addition, code that may be more efficient when run in one flash player version may not be more efficient when run in a different flash player version.

the only way to determine what is and, is not more efficient, is to test yourself:

var NUM:int = 10000000;

var array:Array = [];

var startTime = getTimer();

///* ~2000ms

for (var i:int = NUM-1; i >= 0; i--) {

    array = new Object();

}

trace(getTimer()-startTime);

//*/

/* 2050ms

var tempObject:Object;

for (var i:int = NUM-1; i >= 0; i--) {

    tempObject =  new Object();

    array = tempObject;

}

trace(getTimer()-startTime);

*/

Firefly Community Gallery
Adobe Firefly

Remix with Firefly Community Gallery

Thousands of free creations to fall in love with and remix in Firefly.

Explore now
契約条件Accessibility statement
Using the community Terms of use Privacy Cookie preferences Do not sell or share my personal information ad choicesAdChoices