Skip to main content
Ian Lyons
Community Expert
Community Expert
September 22, 2005
Question

+ Camera Raw Feature Requests +

  • September 22, 2005
  • 536 replies
  • 176959 views

UPDATE:

We're interested in what changes you would like see in our products. Do you have an idea for a feature that would help your workflow? Is there a small change that could be made to make your life a little easier? Let us know!  Share an Idea, Ask a Question or Report a Problem and get feedback from the Product Development Team and other passionate users on the Photoshop Family product Feedback Site on Photoshop.com.

In future it would helpful if you could use this thread as a means to add

"Features" that you would like to see in future releases of Adobe Camera Raw.

Please do NOT create additional new Topics and try not to duplicate requests by other users. Also, be thorough in your description of the feature and why you think Adobe should consider it.

Oh, and if you find it necessary to comment on someone's feature request/suggestion, try not to get into a shouting match. The penalty for doing so is...

b If you're asking that a particular camera is supported in a future release or just taking the opportunity to carp that yours isn't then please do so in another thread!

IanLyons

Forum Host

    This topic has been closed for replies.

    536 replies

    Noel Carboni
    Legend
    July 23, 2010

    I'm evaluating a Canon EOS-7D, whose native pixel count is 5184 x 3456 (17.9 MP).

    To retain the finest level of detail from a Canon image, I have found that conversion directly to an upsampled resolution yields the best results.

    Trouble is, there's only one (slightly) higher pixel count available:  6144 x 4096 (25.2 MP).

    Please add some additional, higher pixel count choices for Canon EOS 1.6x sensor .CR2 conversions - ideally up to 2x the original sensor pixel count in each dimension.

    Thank you.

    -Noel

    sean_r_baker
    Participant
    July 21, 2010

    What are the chances of getting a "Creative Profile" dropdown for the Develop->Calibration section?

    Let me describe what I'm seeking: as opposed to the current system, when one is finished adjusting color modifications in the DNG Profiles Editor, instead of writing a new profile which is unique to that camera and its base profile, a "creative profile" is instead written which can then be applied against any base profile.  Theoretically this can already be done by manually creating all of the relevant mappings and applying them to the base profile of choice.  In practice, it's cludgy, and limits distribution of Creative Profiles to those who have the same camera model or to the very few who are actually comfortable with the Profiles Editor.

    Technically, this change should be relatively easy - the code already exists, albeit in a number of places, and major changes would only be needed if online sharing of Creative Profiles were to be enabled from within the program, akin to the way Lens Corrections are currently.  That's of course a great goal to set, but need not be included in a first release.

    From a marketing perspective, this solves a number of the longstanding complaints about comparisons between ACR and other user-enjoyed RAW engines.  Ship a "Skintone priority" Creative Profile with the release which actively centralizes skin-range colors and desaturates all low-saturated colors, and voila - CaptureOne comparisons are gone and the user can get as inaccurate (but aesthetically pleasing) a rendition as they want.

    Even better: per-camera, per-style profiles no longer need to be created with newly released models - simply create a camera profile which brings color to defined per-manufacturer points, and then release creative profiles which map out to each of the OEM styles ("Portrait", "Landscape", "Neutral", etc. in the Canon parlance).  Now customers can have colors just like their manufacturer does it - no more (well, fewer - I love you guys, but you can't control for per-sensor variation), "It doesn't look like it did on the camera!  Why doesn't Adobe care?" complaints.   [Yes, this carries the burden of breaking the current profiles apart  for implementation, but the payoff comes over time with considerably  fewer profiles to make as increasingly more bodies are released.]

    And finally, from a creative perspective, users who've calibrated their individual bodies (or not - this is the creative aspect) can apply creative profiles to emulate film stocks, cross-processed rendering, etc., all shared with the community online and exclusively through ACR / LR.  Now you're advertising more (exclusive) features based on customer feedback, more that users can expect when switching to or sticking with the pipeline, further developing the community of users, etc.

    All that for what I bet Eric can do in a day or two.

    Hell, I have a case of beer which says he can do it in a motivated afternon .

    MadManChan2000
    Adobe Employee
    Adobe Employee
    July 24, 2010

    Sean, does that imply the case of beer magically appears on my doorstep?!?! 

    (Ok I'll go back to work before I get into any more trouble ...)

    sean_r_baker
    Participant
    July 24, 2010

    That depends on if I'm able to download my ACR update and tell the C1 fans where to stick their 'better', 'iireplicable' color .

    To not be completely OT, though, I agree with Noel that larger scales should exist for interpolation - I don't use it personally, but it just makes sense.  Maybe switch the available sizes to convenient harmonics based off native resolution?

    Known Participant
    July 3, 2010

    Save ACR output to a subfolder relative to the path of the original image.

    Participating Frequently
    July 6, 2010

    Hm, good idea (I presume for my no 1 wish) - will give it a bash

    Participant
    June 14, 2010

    A long time ago in the wonderful land of ARC, one were able to hit the up and down buttons on the keyboard to scroll through the list of saved presets. But about a year or so ago it all changed. "-Why?" we been asking ourselves ever since, but for whatever reason I for one sure miss this simple yet powerful feature. So may I please ask you to consider to make my life a just a notch easier by fixing this? I would be forever grateful, thank you.

    Best Regards,

    Leonard Gren, Photographer

    E-mail: info@leogren.com
    Web: http://www.LeoGren.com

    June 11, 2010

    I posted a feature request at the photoshop request a feature forum

    Add Mini Raw, Camera Raw to HDR, and a HDR Adjustment Brush

    I posted that feature request before stumbling upon this Camera Raw Feature request forum.  After reading this post entirely I see similarities to my request but not as in-depth or as precise as to what have described.  Take a look at it and see what I wrote.

    Participating Frequently
    June 10, 2010

    my top 3 wishlist at the moment:

      • ability to store (and more importantly - ability to then display in bridge) multiple different raw processing options for each raw file in a simpler way than by export to renamed .xmp and then reimport if you want anything other than the current processing options. I can't be the only photographer who likes to visualise multiple different processing options for the same raw file.
      • ability to do some distorting for e.g. perspective correction beyond the simple rotate available from the crop tool.
      • A mild gaussian blur tool as part of the brushes - I know you can get a similar effect using the sharpness plus clarity sliders, but the sharpness effect is too mild and negative clarity introduces colour and tone artefacts - a mostly transparent blur overlay is still the best for improving skin in portraits, and it would be nice to be able to do this without launching photoshop and having to store additional files/layers.
      MadManChan2000
      Adobe Employee
      Adobe Employee
      June 10, 2010

      For items 2 and 3: number 2 has been implemented in 6.1 and number 3

      has become stronger in 6.x via minus local Sharpness.

      Eric

      deejjjaaaa
      Inspiring
      June 11, 2010

      when you are using a crop tool in ACR is it possible to have

      1) some option to display the center of the cropped area (mark it on the screen somehow, w/ a semitransparent crosshair or something like this)

      and

      2) some option (and by option I mean the user will select the behavior of the tool) to have the crop frame displayed immediately when you select the crop tool (right now you have to select something actually) for the first time and have it by default to occupy the whole image... some people, UI wise, prefer to select something from the scratch w/ the mouse and some people prefer actually to start cropping by moving the crop borders inwards from the initial crop = the whole image.

      Known Participant
      May 13, 2010

      A blur tool built into ACR would be great!

      MadManChan2000
      Adobe Employee
      Adobe Employee
      May 13, 2010

      A blur tool built into ACR would be great!

      There is a blur tool in Camera Raw 6 for CS5. You can use local sharpening with a minus (i.e., negative) value. Set Sharpness to -100 to see what I mean.

      Eric

      different_website15C3
      Participant
      May 14, 2010

      The ability to resize the image to any size in Workflow Options (as opposed to the fixed size we currently have). I know you can achieve this via the crop tool, but I think it'd be more intuitive if it was built-in right into Workflow Options. I'd then be able to perform simple resize+save_as_jpeg+output_sharpening right in Camera Raw without having to rely on Image Processor and PS and Actions. Maybe in ACR 6.2 or 6.3 or 6.4?... I'm patient.

      Thanks.

      Yammer
      Inspiring
      May 12, 2010

      The new process in V6 seems to slow down preview updates, when operating sliders, especially with non-zero luminance. And updates seem to be slower, the more zoomed-out the preview is.

      Would it be possible to have another check box to disable preview of PV2010, so as to make slider adjustments smoother and more responsive?

      Known Participant
      May 12, 2010

      I am currently using ACR 5.6...

      I use the adjustment brush feature A LOT. I'll process nearly 25000 raw images this summer, and use the adjustment brush on a decent amount of them.

      It would save me tons of time if I had the ability to have favorite settings, or user settings tabs where I could save several preset setups.

      For example... I often lighten eye socket shadows. which is an exposure of +.4 and I like brush size 3. I also am often darkening skys... big brush, -1 exposure + clarity. ... I often add my own version of vigneting with the exposure brush... medium brush -.8 exposure.

      If I could have a little tabs or buttons on the adjustment brush screen where I could assign several presets it would save me tons of time moving the little sliders back and forth multiple times for each photo. Also, there should be a reset button that moves all the sliders back to 0.

      Also, while I'm at it, I've asked for rule of third markings for the crop tool before (as have others). It's a simple and great idea

      I spend more then 750 hours a year in ACR... please make my life easier

      Marco N.
      Participating Frequently
      February 27, 2010

      Sometimes I deal with tiff files in ACR. I will very happy if camera calibration tab reports the name of the ICC profile and not only an "embedded name", even if the image is without ICC profile (probably ACR assign sRGB profile but I have not investigated)

      Ciao

      Marco