Question
count(id) vs. query.recordcount
I've coded queries both ways over the years, and never
noticed problems either way, but I was coding today and it made me
question: When I need to query to see how many records match my
criteria I could do a count(id) on the table, or just query for the
id and check the recordcount; but is one less taxing on the
database than the other?
I'm assuming the count(id) method is. Am I correct?
I'm assuming the count(id) method is. Am I correct?
