Skip to main content
VL Branko
Inspiring
Jan 2, 2021 3:09 AM UTC
Question

DW and JPEG 2000

Does DW (any version) support JPEG 2000? The reason I ask is that Google SEO suggested JPEG 2000 rather than JPG to speed up pageloads but my antediluvian version of DW doesn't recognize .jpf files.

    This topic is closed to new replies. Start a new post to keep the conversation going.

    10 replies

    MikeB-S9UK
    Known Participant
    Jan 4, 2021 1:17 PM UTC

    I've seen the recommendations in Google Lighthouse too with its suggestions of using http2 etc.

    As long as your images are optimised for the size of the image dimensions you specify, you should be fine.

    Using photoshop export as jpeg with preset quality high or 60 has worked for 20 years so far.

    Page speed is something I am very keen on too.

    Translate
    - "Good English is an Art."
    Nancy OShea
    Community Expert
    Community Expert
    Jan 4, 2021 11:39 PM UTC

    I assume you mean Photoshop CC's File > Export > Export As panel and NOT the legacy Save For Web which is garbage.

     

    Assuming the JPG contains sufficient pixels for the target device (1x, 2x, 3x..), reducing Quality slider can significantly reduce file size without adversely effecting picture quality.  In this example, my original is 2.5MB but my compressed JPG is well under 100KB.  And reducing total pixels (W x H) will further reduce file size for smaller devices that may have low bandwidth data plans.

     

     

    Using Responsive Images.

    https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Learn/HTML/Multimedia_and_embedding/Responsive_images

     

    Translate
    Nancy O'Shea— Product User & Community Expert
    Legend
    Jan 2, 2021 6:33 AM UTC

    The short answer is don't use JPEG 2000 for your website images, read more about browser support and other issues here

    Translate
    Paul-M - Community Expert
    VL Branko
    VL BrankoAuthor
    Inspiring
    Jan 2, 2021 3:05 PM UTC

    Thank you. Why on earth would google SEO recomend this? (Shakes head, and continues to use the Mighty Duck)

    Translate
    Nancy OShea
    Community Expert
    Community Expert
    Jan 2, 2021 7:48 PM UTC

    Hi @VL Branko,

    Long time no-see.   Happy new year!

     

    If you look carefully at the recommendation, Google tells developers in their Lighthouse Opportunities report to use all 3 Next-Gen Image Formats with fallbacks for non-supporting browsers.

     

    In truth, Google's image darling at the moment is WebP which Chrome supports.  But Chrome doesn't support either of the fallbacks.  So use your best judgement and take whatever Google says with a healthy measure of salt.

     

    Translate
    Nancy O'Shea— Product User & Community Expert