Skip to main content
Participating Frequently
June 18, 2013
Answered

Why can't I work with ColdFusion documents?

  • June 18, 2013
  • 12 replies
  • 16117 views

Um... just updated and went to open some ColdFusion files I normally work with but can't open them at all. They are grayed out. And there is no longer a ColdFusion option in the "New" panel. And in preferences you cannot select ColdFusion as the default document type.

Did I just miss where it is?

This topic has been closed for replies.
Correct answer Preran

You may want to post that here to see if you can get more help...?

http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/thread.cfm/threadid:64695


Hi all,

Can you check out this document and let us know if you still need help?

http://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/policy-pricing/open-coldfusion-dreamweaver-cc.html

Thanks,

Preran

12 replies

Participant
November 1, 2015

Just in case Adobe is still listening - yeah, i know it is 2 years later... And my cfm pages render fine in code view, and i know i can open .cfm natively. yay.  But i can't create a "new" cfm document?  how is that not an option?  and how does Emmet syntax (which is awesome) only work with PHP and not CFM? and oh, one more thing, the adobe coldfusion licensing team tells me i need 12 licenses for CF11, though we needed only 1 for CF9.  So adobe - the ColdFusion conference is one week away (November 9-10, 2015, Vegas).  Are you guys prepared to answer these types of questions?  Because they will be asked.  I know because I'm attending.

Hedge
Inspiring
November 2, 2015

Please post their answers back here. would love to know and they don't seem to be inclined to answer them on this message board.

David_Powers
Inspiring
November 2, 2015

I know it upset a lot of ColdFusion developers, but Dreamweaver stopped supporting ColdFusion three years ago, so you're very unlikely to get an Adobe response from this forum, which is mainly frequented by users rather than Adobe staff. For ColdFusion questions, there is a dedicated ColdFusion forum.

Participant
November 18, 2014

Wow, a few years later.. this thread resurfaces. I felt that change indicated that CF was no longer even being actively used at Adobe for any of their projects - because you would figure they would have caught that if they did. It was an easy fix when you found the file to mod... they just removed the functionality of being able to click and open a coldfusion document. That indicated to me that someone had to edit that file and remove that code. That meant someone was told to do so, indicating what I felt was a general shift in the wind away from that technology. I moved every site I had from CF as I took it as a sign that it was on the way out. Whether it was or not is a moot point because I no longer have a single site running Coldfusion nor do I have a single project that uses that technology.

RoyalT
Participant
July 31, 2014

This entire topic is BS!

Adobe..... support your own products with your own products and stop forcing us to use new products that aren't included in our CC subscription.

Most of us in here have been loyal to DW and apparently CF for many years, show your loyalty in return!

While I understand CF is the programming layer and DW is more meant for UI, even the UI developer needs to manipulate the .cfm pages.

If you don't want to support .cfc in DW, ok, that I can swallow, but to remove .cfm? Are you expecting the UI developer to move to CFB too?

FYI... for many versions now if you converted a .cfm page to a DW template, the file was saved as Template.dwt.cfm.  Guess what... you have destroyed my ability to manipulate templates for every site I manage.... thanks for that.

If you are going to replace one IDE with another, make sure they can do the same things.  The way you have to go about using SVN in CFB is silly, if you can integrate SVN with DW, you can do it for CFB too.

Come one guys.... this one is ridiculous!

Known Participant
June 25, 2013

Wake Up Adobe!!!!

You can clearly see that there is a big community of CF Developers who many of us have built entire businesses on Coldfusion and depend on it! Not being able to open a .cfm file from a product that is your own on a language that is your own is a shame. I am sure that 90% of developers know how to change a file association to an extension and can figure out the workaround, that is not the issue I think. The real issue is that you are putting out on the market a software that many developers work on daily basis that suddenly can not even create or open files from your same company. When it is something that can easily be included in the core configuration of the software.

The other important question is> What is next? Is Coldfusion dead?

I think Adobe still at this point has enough time to rethink their strategy and make us all CF developers happy again by AT LEAST not underestimating and forgetting the Coldfusion presence on their own aplications.

One of the main reasons for us to get the coldfusion server was because it promises the compatibility and ease of use with the rest of the Adobe family, we are and have been willing to pay for the server and not move to a free platform like php because we are Adobe believers, but this in my opinion speaks VERY bad about Adobe.

Participating Frequently
June 25, 2013

I totally agree. Why did they do this in secret? That only means that they did not want to mess up their stocks and they are planning an exit. I guess the freeware world wins. Adobe – Shame on you. It clearly states on the CC pages that Adobe values the feedback of the community but why has Adobe not even commented once on any of this? I am willing to bet that they don’t even read this and just don’t care what people think. It is obvious.

Participating Frequently
June 22, 2013

I sincerely hope that someone can offer me a solution to this latest (and quite frankly greatest hiccup in the world of coldfusion for me). I NEVER post on blogs, forums or otherwise as I can usually find what I need to know if I look around but this is not the case. I was anxiously awaiting the new cc for dreamweaver since the purported tools that would make my development much more integrated with the latest methods only to discover this morning that there was absolutely no coldfusion "anything" in the program. I thought it was the way I set up the panels. But nope...


Now I installed cfbuilder. ok, fine it will cover all of the "programming" part of coldfusion and it looks like it will do that better. I get that.


BUT, how exactly do you take the "ugly" stuff that cfbuilder will help me build and actually turn it into a website that the latest trends require? I understand that I can open the file in dreamweaver and make it "pretty" but the real issue is that so much of the time the "application" that I am building is very much a part of the "website" that I am building - ok, ALL the time. What exactly is the commonly accepted workflow that will make this whole thing flow properly without having to switch between completely different applications all the time.


My issue is that maybe I don't understand that cf is a website language for displaying on web browsers, or am I wrong for the past 10 years...


Yes, I develop "applications" that are not pretty sometimes for the customer that needs a program made for them custom, but that is so rare that it does not accompany a website that holds it all.


How is this accomplished? I know I ramble and I hope I got my point across. Can you help me with finding a solution that will allow me to continue to use coldfusion in beautiful css and jquery websites as my customers have come to expect.


Please reply?

Hedge
Inspiring
June 22, 2013

Lots of us feeling the exact same way! I don't want to switch back and forth between applications to get my work done. I want ONE application I can develop in and that used to be DreamWeaver but not anymore.

Participating Frequently
June 22, 2013

This is such a shame. You can get coldfusion code completion in DW CC using the dmxzone extension, however you can only use code view. I was kind of excited about some of the new css and adaptive tools in DW CC but since I work with CF quite a bit I'm less so. Sure you can use the free version of CF Builder, and use DW to do the layout and front end work. Problem is, once you have cf code in the page with a .cfm extension you can only work in code view. I can't find a way to  get .cfm pages to display in Live View.

As a result my workflow has changed the last few days. I've been using Sublime Text and Live Reload. If I'm working with a cfc I use CF Builder, which prior to DW CC I had only tinkered with. It's great for working with CF code. For me DW is headed for the dustbin I'm afraid. Even though I mainly worked in code view, design view and live view were quite handy.

I don't care about the server extensions in DW, however I do care about CF code completion and the ability to view CF in live and design view. It's a total dealbreaker for me. In fact I haven't opened DW in 2 days. I used to use it hours on end daily.

Sure hope Adobe is listening here.

Participant
June 21, 2013

If you are looking for a free CF application, there is CF Builder Express:

http://www.adobe.com/go/trycoldfusionbuilder

Gives you all features for 60 days, then reverts to Express version.

Participant
June 19, 2013

My two cents on the dilemma... well, my solution anyway:

http://trendecide.com/entry/adobe-cc-deprecated-me

Known Participant
June 19, 2013

Great Post Rick. My big disagreement is that Dreamweaver isn't the wrong tool for the job but rather one of the tools needed by many (albeit not all) developers.

You make great points, especially that CFB should now be included in the CC subscription. Given the price and incredible change in workflow required, that's the least that should happen.

Still, this has to indicate that Adobe is deprecating Coldfusion itself. Not only did they remove it from the leading website design tool that they own, they did it (from what I can tell) in relative secrecy. So either they knew it would cause a big backlash or they really do not ever use Coldfusion themselves, or…???

I am willing to be convinced there's some big misunderstanding, but having to spend another $300 on another software and not being able to incorporate CF in Dreamweaver is beyond maddening. It's a reason to consider a new direction.

Participating Frequently
June 19, 2013
Participant
June 19, 2013

Adobe, I'm not sure what is up with you these days. You've killed the visual designer in the latest version of FlashBuilder (4.7) that's available via Creative Cloud, and removed access to FB 4.6 as well to your CC customers. You've now killed a design tool for CF coders. You will be killing access to Fireworks sometime in the next 12 months for Creative Cloud customers. What's next? You've got a large, loyal base of developers that have worked with your software and languages for many years.  You're doing a great job of alientating that base over the last 12 months. My suggestion: just go ahead and get it over, instead of doing this slow bleed. Kill Flash. Kill CF. Just be done with it.

Participating Frequently
June 19, 2013
Known Participant
June 19, 2013

jbliss0j6c - thanks but that did not work for me. Dreamweaver CC tells me I can't select it as an external editor...

Inspiring
June 18, 2013

Crazy.  This is the end for us and Adobe ColdFusion.  We will be cancelling our Adobe subscriptions for our entire team. Really poor decision to alienate the very core of your development population.

S.

Hedge
Inspiring
June 18, 2013

WOW. As a CF person from the Macromedia days I am shocked Adobe has removed CF support in DW CC. That is just plain stupid. I just begrudgingly moved to CC because it felt like I had no other option since everything is going CC and now you remove CF support (your own language) from your main development product? I don't want to have to buy a seperate product to work with CF and use DW CC to do my layout work. If support for CF doesn't get put back into then I will be dropping CC all together and moving to alternative options such as Gimp and Eclipse. VERY disappointed long time customer!