Skip to main content
Participant
June 4, 2010
Question

Help me! Flash is making my PC obsolete!

  • June 4, 2010
  • 1 reply
  • 683 views

Hi..

The title is strong, but it´s true.. i´m using an old laptop (Celeron 1.2Ghz, 512mb ram PC133, 32mb S3 video card).. i can do everything i want in this laptop (text, DVDs, AVI, Music, etc).. but the thing that we use most in a pc nowadays - Internet - Flash is making my pc obsolete:

-Web pages made with flash, are so slow...

-Publicity made with flash make the webpages so slow..

-Watching a flash video in this pc? almost impractable..flash player in Youtube use 100% of processor..in normal screen is almost viewable (in Opera, Chrome, IE, Firefox), but in fullscreen is almost frame-by-frame.

I´ve tryed a lot of flash player version (even the 10.1), but the results is always the same. To improve my internet experience i´ve to use addons to block every Flash content in a webpage. But Flash is everywhere, so my experiences is much faster, but empty. A alternative to Flash player doesnt exists..so i´m stuck to Adobe.

Is there anything i can do to improve this? (beside buying a new laptop, or not viewing flash contents)

Best Regards

    This topic has been closed for replies.

    1 reply

    370H55V
    Inspiring
    June 4, 2010

    Don't take this the wrong way, but it's like an old man in a horse and buggy complaining about the interstate not being safe for his daily commute.

    It's here, and it's not going away, and your hardware (which is what plays Flash content) is... well... obsolete.

    The standard for video RAM these days is anywhere from 8 to ten times what you have, and DDR not SDR. I had 128mb of DDR VRAM in my second PC in 2001. I don't own a system with less than 512mb now.

    The standard for system RAM is DDR2 (PC3200 or better) or DDR3 (PC5300 or better) at 667 to 1067mHz... not 133mHz (PC133). And 512mb is OK for XP, but if you have any software newer than three years old, it just doesn't cut it anymore. I have three (3) systems running XP that I maintain for family members, and they all have 2Gb of PC5300 1067mHz RAM in them. I had to upgrade two of the machines, but it cost me less than $100 to do both.

    Software and Operating systems are built to require the "standard" as a minimum these days. When your processor was built, most Flash content ran at 8-12FPS and didn't require a lot of processor or RAM... because almost nobody HAD a lot of processor or RAM in 2001. Not so today.

    I just finished reloading a nine-year-old laptop for a customer with XP (SP3). A Celeron 1.10gHz with 304mb of PC133 RAM and a whopping 18 gig HD. Just running XP (SP3) in the normal UI takes 100% of the processor. After shutting EVERYTHING down in MSCONFIG and setting the interface to Classic, it runs at about 75% with nothing running other than XP. Launch Firefox, and it goes right to 100% again.

    The Internet and Flash didn't make your PC obsolete anymore than 18-Wheelers and SUVs would make a horse and buggy obsolete. The obsolescence comes from the system itself, and the Internet (and Flash) simply makes it all the more obvious. As to your question, you would need to  replace your processor with a dual core of at least 1.9gHz per core, which would mean replacing your mother board, upgrade your video RAM to 256mb of DDR, and bump your system RAM up to 2Gb of PC5300 1067mHz, which would be possible with the new motherboard and processor, but then all of that would cost about 2-3 times what a new laptop would run you, which is really your best option at this point.

    I understand that your laptop may be perfectly functional, but the fact remains, like my old PPC 700mHz G4 iMac, which I only use for testing things anymore, it's obsolete. Your laptop (as it is presently equipped) is really only good for Solitaire and e-mail. You could replace it with a book of stamps and a deck of cards, and when it gets to that point, it's time to buy a new one.