Skip to main content
Known Participant
October 19, 2008
Question

How fluid is SchemaManager?

  • October 19, 2008
  • 1 reply
  • 444 views
Hey guys,

Are there any big changes expected in SchemaManager at the moment? I'm using it to extract type info from SOAP for a developer workflow tool, and I'm wondering if I'm likely to have to re-do everything to move it to Gumbo.


Any thoughts? It's slow going being completely undocumented, but I'm reasonably familiar with it as it stands now. I've also cloned the mx.rpc.* source tree, added debugging info and chucked all the [Ignore] metadata in order to get some help from Builder... But I don't want to have to include my bastardised version in the final product :)


-Josh

--
"Therefore, send not to know For whom the bell tolls. It tolls for thee."

Like the cut of my jib? Check out my Flex blog!

:: Josh 'G-Funk' McDonald
:: 0437 221 380 :: josh@gfunk007.com

:: http://flex.joshmcdonald.info/

This topic has been closed for replies.

1 reply

matt_chotin
Inspiring
October 20, 2008
We don't have any real changes planned at the moment. Only if we get additional resources to work on the library.<br /><br />Matt<br /><br /><br />On 10/19/08 5:07 PM, "Josh McDonald" <member@adobeforums.com> wrote:<br /><br />A new discussion was started by Josh McDonald in<br /><br />Developers --<br /> How fluid is SchemaManager?<br /><br />Hey guys,<br /><br />Are there any big changes expected in SchemaManager at the moment? I'm using it to extract type info from SOAP for a developer workflow tool, and I'm wondering if I'm likely to have to re-do everything to move it to Gumbo.<br /><br />Any thoughts? It's slow going being completely undocumented, but I'm reasonably familiar with it as it stands now. I've also cloned the mx.rpc.* source tree, added debugging info and chucked all the [Ignore] metadata in order to get some help from Builder... But I don't want to have to include my bastardised version in the final product :)<br /><br />-Josh