Skip to main content
Participating Frequently
February 26, 2009
Question

Flash Media Server 2.0 patches

  • February 26, 2009
  • 3 replies
  • 649 views
Hi,

We want to carry out a long overdue update to our Flash Media Server, which is at version 2.0

1. One concern I have is licensing. We have a 100-user, unlimited bandwidth license. As I understand it, version 2.0.1 introduced licensing profiles. The closest matching profile is for 150 users. I'm not sure - can I select that, or create my own profile so we can use our existing licenses? Or have I misunderstood what the profiles are for?

2. Also, I notice that the existing FMS needs to be uninstalled and then 2.0.1 installed. Is this the case with subsequent patches? I couldn't find a specific answer in the release notes. If so, could I just install 2.0.5 and would that include all the maintenance updates for previous releases?

Sorry if these are obvious questions. I've never updated FMS 2.0, so I just want to make sure it goes well :)

Thanks for your time,

Ajay P
    This topic has been closed for replies.

    3 replies

    March 3, 2009
    Hi Ajay,

    I believe it is, yes. Enjoy!

    Jody
    Ajay_PAuthor
    Participating Frequently
    March 2, 2009
    Jody, that's exactly what I wanted to know.

    I'm currently testing in a development system and hopefully I'll upgrade the live one soon.

    Thanks,

    Ajay
    February 27, 2009
    Hi Ajay,

    1. Yes, you can use the default 150 user profile.
    2. Every installation is a complete installation, not a patch or an update, so you can skip 2.0.1 etc. and install 2.0.5.

    Good luck,
    Jody
    Ajay_PAuthor
    Participating Frequently
    March 3, 2009
    Hi Jody,

    I have a quick question regarding licensing. On my test system I was able to put in the existing 100-user license into the FMS 2.0.5 Management Console. Whereas in version 2 I had 100 peak connections available, with 2.0.5 I now have 150.

    I have no problem with this!

    I just wanted to know if that's because of the updated licensing system in 2.0.5 - i.e. is this by design?

    Thanks again,

    Ajay