Skip to main content
April 13, 2007
Question

Streaming service providers???

  • April 13, 2007
  • 3 replies
  • 479 views
Hi all,

Just a quick question, I'm looking for a service provider to host my Flash videos so that I can play them in the player, who are the best in terms service, features and cost? I know there are a few out there, vitalstream etc... but what should I be looking out for?

Regards
Kevin
    This topic has been closed for replies.

    3 replies

    Participant
    April 19, 2007
    Hello,

    I was in the same situation as you, I created a website for a client, where 10 of their clients have 10 minute videos which they wanted to be viewable online. I originally thought I needed to have flash media server, but realized for the little demand they needed a virtual private server from Godaddy worked fine. They came back to me and had me do a chat room, which does require FMS, so I picked up an entry level account with: www.influxis.com It seems to work well, easy to configure, and fast. They don't host your website, just your dynamic flash files.

    Hope this helps,
    Bradford Knowlton
    brad@UCanBOnline.net
    http://x86Virtualization.com
    April 23, 2007
    Thanks for the info Brad, they do look good... I've delicious'd them for later reference!

    Kevin
    April 16, 2007
    CDN = Content Delivery Network (Akamai and Vitalstream are CDN's).

    Given that you won't be serving large numbers, and the videos are fairly short, I think progressive download would do nicely, and you can serve those file right from your existing webhost (£0 definitely beats £210 ).
    April 13, 2007
    I suppose the best provider (and delivery method) depends on who you need to reach, and how you need to control your content.

    How many users (concurrent) do you need to handle?

    Will those users be spread out across the globe, or will they be mostly local to one country/continent?

    Is true streaming a requirement, or is progressive download (delivery via http) acceptable? The key differences (from a business model standpoint) are:

    - progressively downloaded video is cached on the user's machine, effectively giving them a copy of the media. With a true stream, the data is not saved locally.

    - Progressive video can be served from any http server, so it eliminates the need for a streaming server (much, much less expensive).

    As for the big CDNs, Akamai and VitalStream seem to carry good reputations. I've never deployed an app across a CDN, so I don't have any first hand experience with either of them. What to look for (in terms of cost and service) depends on the traffic you'll serve, and where they'll be (i.e if you have lots of viewers in India, you want a CDN with a good presence in India).



    April 16, 2007
    Hi Jay,
    Thank you for your informative response! I was thinking that I need a streaming service provider because there could well be 10 or more people watching the same video at any one time. There's not going to be a large number of videos and they will typically be in the region of 15 to 20 mb, (around 4 or 5 minutes a piece). I've just spoken to VitalStream and they're quoting me an entry level streaming service of £210 a month. Maybe I should just test the water using progressive download?

    What do you mean by CDN Jay?

    Kind regards
    Kevin