Skip to main content
Known Participant
February 21, 2003
Question

From Apple and Extensis: Font management under Mac OS X

  • February 21, 2003
  • 93 replies
  • 11187 views
Apple Computer and Extensis have free PDF documents aimed at answering many questions about using and managing fonts under Mac OS X.

Click on this link for your copy of Apple's: Using and Managing Fonts in Mac OS X -- A Guide for Creative Professionals.

This technology overview covers:

Best Practices for Font Management
Managing fonts manually
Using a font manager
Organizing fonts for a font manager
Useful font utilities
Preparing Your System
Removing nonessential fonts
Appendix A: Fonts of Mac OS X
Appendix B: Font Support in Mac OS X
Appendix C: Font Locations in Mac OS X
Appendix 😧 Mac OS X and Unicode


===================

Click on this link for your copy of Extensis's: Best Practices for Managing Fonts in Mac OS X

From Extensis: "This document contains detailed recommendations and instructions that can help you work efficiently with fonts in OS X, configure your system to minimize font problems, enhance your workflow."

Feel free to post feedback/augmentation/corrections specific to these two documents here.

However, for all other ATM/Type issues, please search the forum or start a new topic -- do not daisy-chain them here.

Thanks.

Neil
Forum Host
[text amended May 23, 2005]
    This topic has been closed for replies.

    93 replies

    Participant
    March 17, 2005
    Thanks for the info and solidarity, Ramón. I'll definitely look into FontAgent Pro. But if anyone from Adobe is listening, please reconsider killing ATM Deluxe and ATR.
    Ramón G Castañeda
    Inspiring
    March 17, 2005
    GG,

    You are not alone. Many of us wish we had both ATM Deluxe and ATR in OS X.

    Adobe will only say that there will never be a version of ATM for OS X (there is for Windoze). Period.

    The preferred font manager these days seems to be FAP (FontAgent Pro). It's the closest thing to ATM as far as OS X is concerned. Its auto font activation function works well. There is a fully functional trial version.

    Incidentally, I was one of the earliest supporters of Suitcase, having been a beta tester for Steve Brecher when Suitcase was essentially a one-man operation. Then Steve sold it and it went downhill after that.

    Later, Adobe came out with ATM Deluxe and ATR and there was no need for any other font management utility through Mac OS 9.2.2. When Adobe decided not to support ATM Deluxe in OS X, I went back to investigate Suitcase, then at version 10. Well, Suitcase 10 was so buggy and the Suitcase Engine caused so many crashes in Classic and in straight, native 9.2.2, that, reluctantly, I couldn't consider it seriously any longer.

    FontAgent Pro is not perfect and it still lacks the flexibility of ATR, but the latest version leaves Suitcase in the dust.
    Participant
    March 17, 2005
    Can anyone explain why why why ATM was not upgraded for OSX? Especially since the Creative Suite is trouncing QuarkXpress? It's the best font management I've used...I really dislike all the font management I've tried that's available for OSX...the built-in management is too lightweight and Suitcase has proven to be unreliable in its auto-activation, and additionally I've had strange preview problems in InDesign that seem related to Suitcase as they disappear when Suitcase is off. I've also had some of the same problems Colleen described above. I never had anything close to these issues with ATM....I would give anything to be back with sweet ATM.
    Participating Frequently
    July 22, 2004
    Hey Tim,
    Thanks for your input. I'll get it straightened out someday.
    Participating Frequently
    July 14, 2004
    Well I appreciate the advice, but I am in a difficult position. I used to use Suitcase 10 when I first upgraded to Jaguar; I had lots of problems with it. I have constant font issues in my work (All of the fonts I use have come in with projects from other people) and my employer holds me responsible for them. I am now using Panther. When the system tells me there Zapf dings are missing but I can see it in the fonts folder and in Fontbook I get really frustrated. I have tried removing the dfonts and just have mine in there, but they didn't show up in the menus. Have removed mine and tried to rely on the dfonts, that didn't work either. I am beyond confused at this point.
    We had a graphic artist from a design shop we outsource to come in and troubleshoot my font problems, and she recommended ditching Suitcase and just using FontBook. She said at the design shop, they use Fontbook now. So I figured if it works for them it should work for me.
    It was great to get a recommendation to use a font cache cleaner to fix my AGaramonds that look garbled on screen in Quark (they look fine in Illustrator)
    but my supervisor doesn't know anything about this stuff so it was referred to tech support and they mostly know about PCs, not graphic applications on the Mac; so don't know if I'll ever hear back from them, and I am not allowed to do anything with my computer.
    I am criticized at work for having all these problems and not being able to fix them. I was sure hoping that following the instructions in the Apple document, of which this thread is supposed to relate, would fix things up, but the dfont problem is just not going away. It seems that if you have a version of a font that you use for a particular project, and a font of the same name is used and provided by your system for its own use, you're going to have trouble no matter what you do.
    Okay, so wah, wah, wah, I'm done whining now. I just needed to vent.
    tlmurray23
    Inspiring
    July 17, 2004
    I've read through these posts, and thought I'd offer some generalizations and rules of thumb that may be of help. In the following, T1 = Type 1, TT = TrueType, OT = OpenType, DF = dFont. Note that I don't use QuarkXpress, but I've used all the others mentioned. Also, the only OTs I use are Adobe's T1-based fonts; I don't use any TT-based OTs.

    Without Suitcase (can't vouch for others) =========

    A TT, OT, and T1 in Classic's Fonts folder is available to both Classic and OSX. If you don't have ATM Lite, however, T1s will be jagged in Classic.

    A DF in Classic's Fonts folder is available to OSX apps, but not to Classic apps.

    With Suitcase ====================================

    If Suitcase was installed after installing Classic support, fonts enabled via Suitcase, other than DFs, are available to all apps; I know of no Classic app that can use a DF.

    I mentioned "after installing Classic support" because you need one or two special Suitcase extensions. If you install Suitcase before Classic, the extensions won't be there and Classic apps won't be able to use the fonts made available by Suitcase.

    Other tidbits ==================================

    If you have a T1 version of a DF, you don't need both. So far I've never encountered anything that complained that it needed a DF. Whether or not you *want* both only you can answer, but I see no reason. My own system, which is Classic and 10.3.4, uses only three DFs in the root Library: LastResort, LucidaGrande, and Monaco. The only fonts in Classic are Geneva, Chicago, and T1 Symbol. All other fonts are managed via Suitcase.
    Known Participant
    July 14, 2004
    If you have more than a handful of fonts, please don't use FontBook. Font Agent Pro is a viable solution. Some folks also like Suitcase or FontReserve (these two are from Extensis).

    Neil
    Ramón G Castañeda
    Inspiring
    July 14, 2004
    Bob,

    It's probably because Font Book is inadequate. Try FAP (Font Agent Pro).
    Inspiring
    July 13, 2004
    Colleen. I once again share your pain. And, I do wish Apple and Adobe could offer a better solution tahn to say that we should make sure only one font type of the same family is active at the same time, because, as you have found, sometimes it is difficult to change (a System font), and at other times, other programs may have installed fonts for us (Adobe and Microsoft to mane two).

    I just ran across a problem with Futura. Apple installs a dfont andI have my own. I Deactivated Apple's with Font Book; but, my Futura Regular Type 1 font (or Medium...different programs list the font under different names) is not selectable...only Apple's dFont. I actually have to remove Apple's dfont in order to be able to use mine. I guess that is because Adobe InDesign sees that the dfont is newer (becuase it has more characters, I have been told) and uses it...even though I can select the rest of my Fut font family.

    Sigh!
    Inspiring
    July 11, 2004
    For what it's worth, fonts installed in the Classic fonts folder are available to OS X native applications. However, fonts installed in the OS X system locations (including dfonts) are not available to Classic applications.

    Cheers,

    T
    Known Participant
    July 10, 2004
    QuarkXPress v6.x IS required to run native under OS X. XPress v3, v4, and v5 cannot do this. QuarkXPress will show all fonts installed and active -- but I don't know if v6 will also show if a font is Type 1, TrueType, or OpenType.

    Neil