Skip to main content
June 11, 2009
Question

Oldstyle figures in Didot

  • June 11, 2009
  • 1 reply
  • 3081 views

Can anyone explain why the oldstyle figures in Linotype Didot are the size they are in proportion to each other? 0, 1 and 2 are so small compared to 3 through 9 that they look really strange. Is there a general principle that designers follow when creating figures like this?

Thanks,

John

    This topic has been closed for replies.

    1 reply

    Ramón G Castañeda
    Inspiring
    June 12, 2009
    In old-style figures, the shape and positioning of the numerals varies as those of lowercase letters do. In the most common scheme, 0, 1, and 2 are of x-height, having neither ascenders nor descenders; 6 and 8 have ascenders; and 3, 4, 5, 7, and 9 have descenders. Other schemes exist; for example, the types cut by the Didot family of punchcutters and typographers in France between the late 18th and early 19th centuries typically had an ascending 3 to prevent confusion with the cursive form of the lowercase letter z, a form preserved in some later French typefaces. A few other typefaces used different arrangements.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Text_figures

    June 18, 2009

    Thanks for the link, Ramón, and for taking the trouble to answer. I still think they look disproportionately small in this typeface, but at least now I know why.

    John

    PS The Eszet in Didot is particularly fine , to my way of thinking anyway.

    Ramón G Castañeda
    Inspiring
    June 18, 2009

    JLoydall wrote:


    PS The Eszet in Didot is particularly fine , to my way of thinking anyway.

    It's just OK, John.   (Good memory!  )

    AAAAAAA_Didot_EsZet.jpg

    AAAAAAAA_Bauer_Bodoni.jpg

    AAAAAA_Palatino_EsZet.jpg

    Message was edited by: Ramón G Castañeda