Not sure why my images "violate guidelines" (image depicts children)

[Trace35191221nizm]

I attempted to generate video from two different photos of a man and his mother and a family walking in the woods. Both were immediately rejected. Then I used Firefly to generate an image of a man holding his daughter and tried to use that, but it was also rejected. I've attached these images here. I can find no reason that the system would reject these on a content-level. So any thoughts you have would be appreciated.

[droopydog500]

Hello @Woolfy,

Thank you for your message. 

I have merged your message into this thread. I am sorry you are having this problem. 

The Firefly image to video model will not generate videos from images containing children. That is why it would not generate the videos. This is a limitation in this model.

Thanks,
    droopy

[TinyAcademyGroup]

I am trying to generate videos via Veo 3.1 Fast, and it returns errors about user guidelines not being met even though the image start frames are and should be safe where it had no prior problems before or on other video generation sites.
 
These are the types of images I already generated on other sites as recourse and am having no trouble with other sites. What gives Adobe/Google? The other partner models work but they produce terrible results compared to Veo 3.1 Fast. Not to mention they are uneconomical with credit usage. Please advise.

[droopydog500]

Hello @TinyAcademyGroup,

Thank you for your message. 

I have merged your message into this thread. I am sorry you are having this problem. 

The Firefly image to video model will not generate videos from images containing children. That is why it would not generate the videos. This is a limitation in this model.

Thanks,
    droopy

[TinyAcademyGroup]

Actually Firefly video works fine with the image to video (same with the other partner models), just Veo 3.1 Fast as mentioned is not working properly with the starting images. This is problematic because Veo 3.1 Fast is the most reliable and best quality video generations (apart from Kling AI which is not included here). Is there a reason the problem only persists with Veo 3.1 Fast and not other partner models/Firefly?

[cinemascene]

bon alors maintenant , on me dit que les images que je viens de créer par adobe ne respectent pas les consignes d'utilisation  ! .. il faudrait vous mettre d'accord , on devient fou à force de chercher comment détourner le systeme qui déraille ..  voyez les images  que j'ai créées avec Nano Banana..  j'ai demandé à VEO 3.1 de me créer une sequence entre les 2 .. non ce n'est pas permis .. pourquoi ? 

[cinemascene]

et c'est pareil avec le modele ADOBE ! 

[droopydog500]

Bonjour @cinemascene,

I have merged your message into this thread. I am sorry you are having this problem. 

The Firefly image to video model will not generate videos from images containing children. That is why it would not generate the videos. This is a limitation in this model.

Bien à vous,
droopy

[pit_graf5421]

Hallo, alles gut und schön mit Kindern aber ich habe ein 50 Jahre altes Bild meiner frau ohne Kinder und untergeordnete Objekte. Eigenes Foto und verstösst gegen die rechte ich kann da nichts finden.

[droopydog500]

The model is not perfect at determinining what is a child or not. In this case, the youthful look of this woman seems to trigger the child restriction. I asked for this photo to be looked at.

    droopy