Fake AI Misleading photos - how to report

[trishaw19134217]

Central Park NYC AI Gen Photo 

How do photos get accepted by Adobe? Central park lake does not have an island. How does one report this I see no way to flag it

[oleschwander]

Seems there are lots of problems in this image. And also other AI images of Central Park at Adobe. Important: 'Editorial use must not be misleading or deceptive'. But may non-editorial images be misleading or deceptive?

[oleschwander]

Also images from other cities around the world are totally far out ...!

[Jill_C]

It's my understanding that AI images that purport to represent a particular place need to be accurate. On this page:

Generative AI Content (adobe.com)

it says:

Don't: Describe or depict subjects or locations in ways that may mislead buyers.

However, I find many, many AI images of "places" that don't look at all at the places they purport to be. I visited Norway in June, and have some beautiful images from Bergen, so I searched on "Bergen" to see what's already in the database. I was shocked at the number of Bergen AI images that don't look at all like the historic places I visited. Hopefully "Buyer beware" applies, and Buyers will steer away from this type of content.

[Jill_C]

Perhaps @Contributor1 can refer this one back to the moderation staff. It violates one of the AI rules:

Don't: Describe or depict subjects or locations in ways that may mislead buyers.

[Contributor1]

Hello @trishaw19134217, I see the issue you're referencing and I've sent these details to be reviewed internally. Thank you for the report and sorry for the problem with the image.

[oleschwander]

Adobe should ban AI generated real locations. They can never be completely true to life, only more or less similar. Some of them are completely far-fetched.

[Jill_C]

I agree. If a Buyer wants an image of Central Park in NYC they don't want one that looks kinda sorta like Central Park. I suppose those Buyers will just exclude AI from their search criteria.

[trishaw19134217]

For anything under "Photos" AI shoud either not be permitted or should be turned off by default.

[Jill_C]

Adobe allows Gen AI images to be submitted under file type "Photos" if they are "photo realistic". I think that was a mistake, as leaving it up to the Contributor to determine if their image is "photo realistic" is asking for an abuse of the system.

[daniellei4510]

There are no doubt cases of abuse. But the real problem is that most people don't understand what photorealisic REALLY looks like. Skin that looks like that of a Disney character is not photorealistic. Fingers melded together like a mitten is not photorealistic. A surrealistic image of a woman relaxing on a cloud is not photorealist, no matter how well the subject is rendered. We are at the mercy of the moderators to understand which is which and reject/accept as appropriate.

[oleschwander]

If a buyer is looking for a picture of Central Park or any other location, it is not their job to find out if it is realistic. Not all buyers know what AI is - and certainly not that the images are misleading. Then Adobe must state that the AI ​​images do not show the correct locations.

[Jill_C]

The Moderation team cannot be expected to know what each place on earth really looks like; therefore, they should just reject any AI image that refers to a real location. AI Contributors should be limited to descriptions such as "A centrally located park with an island in the center in a major metropolitan city of high rises" - instead of Central Park, New York City.