What version of scorm?

[MarkAllenSchneider]

Good day!  I have a third-party company that provided a scorm file.  It works on scormcloud, but not on SAP's SuccessFactors.  Would someone mind checking this manifest file and tell me if you see anything strange?  Also, what version of scorm?  Thank you in advance.

<?xml version = '1.0'?>
<manifest identifier='GN_01_1_man'
xmlns = 'http://www.imsproject.org/xsd/imscp_rootv1p1p2'
xmlns:adlcp = 'http://222.adlnet.org/xsd/adlcp_rootvip2'
xmlns:xsi = 'http://www.w3.org/2001/xmlSchema-instance'
xsi:schemaLocation = 'http://www.imsproject.org/xsd/imscp_rootv1p1p2 imscp_rootv1p1p2.xsd
http://www.imsglobal.org/xsd/imsd_rootv1p2p1 ismd_rootv1p2p1.xsd
http://www.adlnet.org/xsd/adlcp_rootv1p2 adlcp_rootv1p2.xsd'>
<organizations default='GN_01_1_series'>
<organization identifier='GN_01_1_series' structure= 'hierarchical'>
<title>Admission - CE</title>
<item identifier='GN_01_1' identifierref='GN_01_1_res' >
<title>Admission - CE</title>
</item>
</organization>
</organizations>
<resources>
<resource identifier='GN_01_1_res' type='webcontent' href='mcsloader.htm?crs_acro=316&amp;site_id=EPM_Connect' adlcp:scormtype='sco'></resource>
</resources>
</manifest>

[Lilybiri]

Since it works fine on SCORM Cloud, the problem is with the LMS. Can you contact the LMS people?

[MarkAllenSchneider · Accepted solution]

I figured it out.  They never specified the version of scorm.  So while scormcloud ignored this, SuccessFactors was not able to. I changed the mannifest file to include right about <organization>

<metadata>
<schema>ADL SCORM</schema>
<schemaversion>1.2</schemaversion>
</metadata>

... and that did it.

Thank you,

Mark

[Lilybiri]

?? You cannot publish a SCO from Captivate without specifying the SCORM version. By default it is 1.2. This is very strange.

[MarkAllenSchneider]

Very true.  I do not know what Elsevier was using to generate these files, but I wanted to go to my Captivate group for input on the manifest file.  Again, this is no reflection on Captivate or issues pertaining to this software.  I'm sorry, I should have specified that in my OP.  Thank you, Lilybiri, as always 🙂