Skip to main content
Legend
July 15, 2016
Answered

Query scope descrepancy between tag and script

  • July 15, 2016
  • 3 replies
  • 2112 views

I'm fairly certain I found a scope bug. I'm using CF11 and FW/1 and I have the following query -- the tag works, the cfscript equivilent triggers a "Table named rc.qSignerLinks was not found in memory" exception:

/* works*/

<cfquery name="local.qResultSet" result="local.qResult" dbtype="query">

    SELECT

        *

    FROM

        rc.qRSRecipient

    where

        [email] = <cfqueryparam value="#session.user.getEmail()#" cfsqltype="CF_SQL_VARCHAR" maxlength="50" />

</cfquery>

/* exception */

<cfscript>

    local.qObj = new query();

    local.qObj.setDBType("query");

    local.qObj.setSQL("

        SELECT

            *

        FROM

            rc.qRSRecipient

        where

            [email] = :email

    ");

    local.qObj.addParam( name="email",value="#session.user.getEmail()#",cfsqltype="CF_SQL_VARCHAR",maxlength="50" );

    local.qObjResult = local.qObj.execute();

    local.qResultSet= local.qObjResult.getResult().recordCount NEQ 0;

</cfscript>

    This topic has been closed for replies.
    Correct answer BKBK

    Yes, Steve, that problem has been known for some years now. The usual fix is to add the resultset using setAttributes(), like this:

    local.qObj.setAttributes(tbl = rc.qRSRecipient);

    local.qObj.setSQL("SELECT  *  FROM tbl WHERE [email] = :email");

    3 replies

    BKBK
    Community Expert
    Community Expert
    July 17, 2016

    Having said that, I still think you should file a bug report.

    WolfShade
    Legend
    July 18, 2016

    I'm not sure I'd classify this as a bug.  I mean, granted, it does not act the same way as the tag-based CFQUERY, but not placing the query-to-be-queried within the same scope as the QoQ doesn't really seem like a bug, to me.

    V/r,

    ^_^

    Legend
    July 19, 2016

    I'm also not sure that's a bug - it's actually a sign of proper encapsulation.  Since new query() is instantiating an object from query.cfc (which comes with ColdFusion), the object won't know anything outside of itself.  So anything it needs to know must be explicitly passed to it (as BKBK​ indicated by using setAttributes() ).

    Again, if possible, I'd switch over to using queryExecute() instead.  I don't think Adobe is planning on doing a lot to maintain the CFC implementations of script functions, as most if not all of them are now implemented as built-in functions.

    -Carl V.


    I am trying the queryExecute on a query of queries. How do I pass the table if I have it in the local scope? I have local.qTable as a query result set. I've tried the following:

    SELECT * FROM local.qTable

    I've tried adding table in the queryParams and queryOptions with the following:

    SELECT * from :table

    and

    SELECT * from table

    All have failed and the documentation I found leaves much to be desired in this area: ColdFusion Help | QueryExecute

    BKBK
    Community Expert
    BKBKCommunity ExpertCorrect answer
    Community Expert
    July 17, 2016

    Yes, Steve, that problem has been known for some years now. The usual fix is to add the resultset using setAttributes(), like this:

    local.qObj.setAttributes(tbl = rc.qRSRecipient);

    local.qObj.setSQL("SELECT  *  FROM tbl WHERE [email] = :email");

    WolfShade
    Legend
    July 15, 2016

    Not sure if this will help, but there is a Ben Nadel post about CF9's "query.cfc" and using a cfscript qoq.  I hope it might present some insight.

    I've never tried to run a standard query in cfscript, much less a QoQ in cfscript. 

    HTH,

    ^_^

    Carl Von Stetten
    Legend
    July 15, 2016

    You might also try looking at the new queryExecute() function introduced in CF11 for script.  It usually works better than the query.cfc-based script approach.