As stated in my post, I have had very few problems. My
disclaimer had to do with the fact that I, personally, have not
been active in maintaining and managing my sites. This part of my
post is not to be perceived as a negative on the part of
CrystalTech.
I have been a CF developer from nearly CF's inception. The
vast majority of my work is done on my intranet at work, hence my
minimal activity on my personal sites hosted at CT (which are on a
shared server). It is like the old adage, "Does a mailman go for a
walk on his day off???"
My lack of dependency on CT's support staff is a reflection
on the fact that once my code was working, I left it alone! It just
keeps ticking, as they say.
So, to rephrase my post from above, I have been quite happy
with CT, however my needs have been very minimal, and thus I cannot
comment on how well or how poorly CT deals with or responds to
problems. What I CAN comment on is my observation that more and
more developers, especially on this board, have been turning to the
other mentioned CF host and reported overwhelmingly satisfying
results. Where CT was once considered the defacto standard for CF
hosting, there are competitors eating up a good share of the
market.
I find Craig Brown's posting on this thread quite noteworthy,
however, and evidence of CT's dedication to CF and it's community.
14
Replies
AdChoices