Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I have a number of complaints about the subscription plans offered by Adobe.
There are a number of applications in the Creative Cloud Complete Plan that are clearly infrequently used, and I feel that including the cost of these applications in the price is an unnecessary burden on the user.
Isn't there a need to create more flexible plans?
For example, if there are five applications or services that need to be used, we would like to see a plan where individuals buy a quota for those five applications and choose which applications they want to use.
(e.g. Illustrator, Photoshop, AdobeFonts, Behance, Portfolio = 5 quotas)
By introducing a flexible plan structure tailored to individual use in this way, we can more clearly visualize what users really want and also control the expansion of development costs, don't you think?
I think that by including an objective user perspective on development costs, we can more clearly see the cost of deploying new technologies, offerings, and the advertising that goes into them...
What do you think about Adobe?
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
What do you think about Adobe?
By @andy1126
I am a volunteer who does not work for Adobe, but as I understand it the price is based on that most users will use 3-4 applications and can choose which ones. The others are available if you ever need them. Personally I use four apps.
Jane
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I like the "all you can eat buffet" approach that is now currently in place.
I generally only use 4 or 5, but I like the option to use some once a year or so without having to pay extra.