Dreamweaver support to ASP.NET

[Phoenix_Wang]

Dreamweaver support to ASP.NET.

[Newsgroup_User]

Actually I'd prefer that DW stay out of ASP.NET and stick with working on
it's core area, the IDE for developing web pages. Visual Studio is now
available in free versions, so there's no excuse anymore to using DW for
ASP.NET development.



"Phoenix Wang" <webforumsuser@macromedia.com> wrote in message
news:e2stuj$70s$1@forums.macromedia.com...
> As we know, Dreamweaver is the world's most advanced?clear and easy to use
> web
> IDE both for design and application development, but to the web
> applicaiton
> development of ASP.NET, the Dreamweaver IDE to ASP.NET(such as code
> hint?code
> generate and display?control navigation and dialogue-driven streamlining
> operation)?API to .NET Framework and some components could be furtherly
> enhanced to meet the needs of ASP.NET developers. Go ahead, great
> Macromedia
> software architects and designers!
>

[Newsgroup_User]

"John" <NoSPAMSY@ACMEACE.COM> wrote in message
news:e2t9f7$m8a$1@forums.macromedia.com...
> Actually I'd prefer that DW stay out of ASP.NET and stick with working on
> it's core area, the IDE for developing web pages. Visual Studio is now
> available in free versions, so there's no excuse anymore to using DW for
> ASP.NET development.

No - I think that competion is good, and Dreamweaver (Ultradev) has always
been good at creating ASP / other code for beginners. ... I would love it to
be able to do reasonably good at .net stuff - just good enough for me to be
able to use it to compliment all the other tools ...

G

[Newsgroup_User]

Unfortunately DW hides a lot of the code in it's proprietary DLL.
So, you really don't learn any proper methods.

"G" <anom@NoWhere.ocm> wrote in message
news:e2tubo$lav$1@forums.macromedia.com...
>
> "John" <NoSPAMSY@ACMEACE.COM> wrote in message
> news:e2t9f7$m8a$1@forums.macromedia.com...
>> Actually I'd prefer that DW stay out of ASP.NET and stick with working on
>> it's core area, the IDE for developing web pages. Visual Studio is now
>> available in free versions, so there's no excuse anymore to using DW for
>> ASP.NET development.
>
> No - I think that competion is good, and Dreamweaver (Ultradev) has always
> been good at creating ASP / other code for beginners. ... I would love it
> to be able to do reasonably good at .net stuff - just good enough for me
> to be able to use it to compliment all the other tools ...
>
> G
>

[Phoenix_Wang]

a