Hi Sandra,
Have you tried using 1/0 or Yes/No as opposed to True/False?
<input <%If
(CStr((rsViewAccess.Fields.Item("fldReadTerms").Value)) =
CStr("Yes")) Then Response.Write("checked=""checked""") :
Response.Write("")%>
name="checkbox" type="checkbox" value="checkbox"
checked="checked" />
...or:
<input <%If
(CStr((rsViewAccess.Fields.Item("fldReadTerms").Value)) =
CStr("1")) Then Response.Write("checked=""checked""") :
Response.Write("")%>
name="checkbox" type="checkbox" value="checkbox"
checked="checked" />
Please note, the above code may not be correct, I'm just
using it to
illustrate that you could try "Yes" or "1" rather than
"True", to see if it
makes a difference.
I hope this is useful.
Regards
Nath.
"Database Novice" <webforumsuser@macromedia.com> wrote
in message
news:eigbtp$rn7$1@forums.macromedia.com...
> I've been going round in circles trying to solve my
problem of dynamic
> checkboxes in an ASP script and I was wondering if
anyone can help me. In
> addition, I've read the Ultradev pages on Adding dynamic
content for
> checkboxes
> and I can't see what I'm doing wrong.
>
> The check box links to a Yes/No field in MS Access. I
have created a
> filtered
> recordset.
>
> I want this checkbox in a form that has an update server
behavior.
>
> The code for the checkbox that gets generated is:
>
> <input <%If
(CStr((rsViewAccess.Fields.Item("fldReadTerms").Value)) =
> CStr("True")) Then Response.Write("checked=""checked""")
:
> Response.Write("")%>
> name="checkbox" type="checkbox" value="checkbox"
checked="checked" />
>
> However the above code doesn't display a 'check' or
'uncheck' when the
> content
> of the field in the database is 'true' or 'false'
respectively. (I've
> added a
> control field to view the content of the field - this
displays the content
> of
> the Yes/No field as 'true' or 'false'). Once manually
checked or
> unchecked by
> the user, the checkbox updates the database correctly.
The problem
> appears to
> be only with the display of the content of the Yes/No
field using the
> checkbox.
>
> Many thanks
> Sandra
>
>
>