• Global community
    • Language:
      • Deutsch
      • English
      • Español
      • Français
      • Português
  • 日本語コミュニティ
    Dedicated community for Japanese speakers
  • 한국 커뮤니티
    Dedicated community for Korean speakers
Exit
0

New Extensions site

Community Expert ,
Sep 27, 2017 Sep 27, 2017

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Just saw that the old Add-ons site is migrating to a new extensions site. I haven't done many extensions due to the fact that it has been difficult for people to upload them at times, and packaging has been an issue for me. I don't do enough to warrant getting a paid certificate. Will the new site be easier to upload? Can you still use the Adobe packager for this? Can you post paid extensions using a self cert rather than a paid one?

Views

1.9K

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines

correct answers 1 Correct answer

Guru , Sep 27, 2017 Sep 27, 2017

Self-Cert should work

Easier upload, time will tell, (another  2 or 3 weeks)

Packaging - by command line

Votes

Translate

Translate
Guru ,
Sep 27, 2017 Sep 27, 2017

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Self-Cert should work

Easier upload, time will tell, (another  2 or 3 weeks)

Packaging - by command line

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Sep 27, 2017 Sep 27, 2017

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I haven't done the packaging by command line yet. Where can I find instructions?

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Engaged ,
Sep 27, 2017 Sep 27, 2017

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Guru ,
Sep 27, 2017 Sep 27, 2017

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Take note of the links on the home page Extensions / Add-ons Development

The 2nd FAQ contains the above link.

Davide's got a more recent post on signing and timestamp failures search for it on the site.

Highly recommend going through the links on the home page even on a quick peek bases to get a picture of what's out there.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Sep 27, 2017 Sep 27, 2017

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Thanks. Yea, I have used Davide's link to sign the panels that I made in the past.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Engaged ,
Sep 29, 2017 Sep 29, 2017

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

My blog contains few entries relative to packaging:

HTML Panel Tips #24: Fixing ZXP Timestamping errors | Photoshop, etc.

HTML Panels Tips: #13 Automate ZXP Packaging with Gulp.js | Photoshop, etc. ​

HTML Panels Tips: #10 Packaging / ZXP Installers | Photoshop, etc.

Hope this helps!

Davide Barranca - PS developer and author
www.ps-scripting.com

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Oct 06, 2017 Oct 06, 2017

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Trevor, thanks for the info.

Do you know if the old command line tool, ucf.jar, is now obsolete and we should wait for a new one?

I used it in the past but didn't touch for over a year by now.

I tried it again today on macOS High Sierra - and it's either produces a bunch of errors or does nothing.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Engaged ,
Oct 07, 2017 Oct 07, 2017

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

ucf.jar is still useful if you want to pack extension with CS6 compatibility.

Frankly, I've never run it on my current OS (Sierra) hence I've no first-hand experience on High Sierra

Davide Barranca - PS developer and author
www.ps-scripting.com

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Oct 07, 2017 Oct 07, 2017

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Thanks Davide!

My version of ucf.jar is dated December 12, 2012. I wonder if yours is more recent?

Before posting here, I wanted to check if I have the latest version of ucf.jar which I successfully used on earlier systems to package products that support CS6-CC 2015 (the last time I cared to update on Add-ons was over a year ago).

All links to ucf.jar on Adobe pages seems to be gone. The only links I found were on your helpful website - but they didn't work either, redirecting instead to the current Adobe homepage.

Which means to me that this version of ucf.jar is officially abandoned by Adobe.

On the other hand, in their recent email regarding the new Exchange, Adobe tells us to "continue to submit updates" to Add-ons. I wonder how do they expect us to submit updates if they officially abandoned the current packaging tools.

In any case, I guess we'll get more info from Adobe once the new Exchange goes live. Or is there some updated info regarding packaging tools that I'm missing?

Thanks,

Leo

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Engaged ,
Oct 08, 2017 Oct 08, 2017

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Hi Leo,

for packaging, I'm still relying on ZXPSignCmd to bundle CC->CC-latest stuff.

As for the new Add-ons, it will not support CS6 AFAIK, so one less problem 🙂 It has to be seen yet whether they will implement a better version of their online packaging tool – I think I will keep using my local CLI/building system, though.

Davide Barranca - PS developer and author
www.ps-scripting.com

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Oct 08, 2017 Oct 08, 2017

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Thanks Davide,

ZXPSignCmd worked! I wasn't aware of this tool until I visited your website.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
New Here ,
Sep 27, 2017 Sep 27, 2017

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Correct

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Guest
Dec 23, 2019 Dec 23, 2019

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

LATEST

True

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines