Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Hi all,
I've seen a few other discussions about this but none answers my question.
I have inherited/am updating some very large documents that have more figures than most art museums, and more tables than an army mess hall.
The figure numbering was structured by a former writer. About 90% of the time, it works properly. However, intermittently, the figure numbering restarts (at 1) halfway through a single document (not a single book). Sometimes (but not always) there is a table that exists between one figure and then next, and sometimes (but not always) removing this table seems to resolve the figure numbering and make it sequential again.
I just noticed this and am up against a deadline yesterday, pretty much. I can provide any supporting material (how figures are formatted, tables are formatted, etc). I personally avoid overusing figures, so I have never encountered thsi before. Any help would be tremendously appreciated.
My guess is that the autonumbering for the tables is using the same series label as the figures. In your case, the table is resetting the numbering or changing it in some way so that the following figure restarts. So, the trick is to use one series label for tables and a different one for figures.
The series label is part of the autonumbering, something like S:<n+>. In this case, the S is the series label (note the colon). Use say a T for tables and an F for figures.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
My guess is that the autonumbering for the tables is using the same series label as the figures. In your case, the table is resetting the numbering or changing it in some way so that the following figure restarts. So, the trick is to use one series label for tables and a different one for figures.
The series label is part of the autonumbering, something like S:<n+>. In this case, the S is the series label (note the colon). Use say a T for tables and an F for figures.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Thank you!! That was it. Thanks a ton!
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Yea, I personally actually like the case for NO numbering, and the case for fewer figures!
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
If you are using separate numbering for tables and figures, you may also
want to look at "The case for simple numbering," which can be found
here: <http://www.techknowledgecorp.com/nonum.html>.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Mike,
The link provided was very interesting. Is there a place that I can read more about the study?
Thanks,
ls
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
The link provided was very interesting. Is there a place that I can
read more about the study?
I don't know. I was merely forwarding a link someone once forwarded to
me. You'd have to check with the party that posted the document. There
is contact info on the home page of the site.
Find more inspiration, events, and resources on the new Adobe Community
Explore Now