• Global community
    • Language:
      • Deutsch
      • English
      • Español
      • Français
      • Português
  • 日本語コミュニティ
    Dedicated community for Japanese speakers
  • 한국 커뮤니티
    Dedicated community for Korean speakers
Exit
0

Placed Image Scaling is wrong?

Enthusiast ,
Sep 16, 2024 Sep 16, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I hate to resort to a "sensationalist" title for this post but it looks like I'm hitting a small "wall", here.
In a new document, I placed the following "Barbie logo" in PNG format :

Barbie Logo (Opaque).png

When I imported the file, I simply clicked and immediately released the mouse, so, to my knowledge, the image is placed at 100% scale yet Illustrator has the nerve to tell me that the image is at 75% scale, in the Links palette (sorry for the French UI):

RogerBreton_0-1726516752088.png

What am I doing wrong?

 

TOPICS
Performance

Views

856

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines

correct answers 1 Correct answer

Community Expert , Sep 16, 2024 Sep 16, 2024

I'm seeing that too. Also with JPG but not TIF. It was not always the case; I just tested an older version (CC2020) and it's fine so something has changed in recent versions. A bug?

That being said, the file IS placing at 100%, it's just reporting 75% incorrectly for some reason. Since your resolution in the file is 96ppi and your file is 5000 pixels wide, it should place at 52" wide, which it does.

 

Votes

Translate

Translate
Adobe
Community Expert ,
Sep 16, 2024 Sep 16, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I'm seeing that too. Also with JPG but not TIF. It was not always the case; I just tested an older version (CC2020) and it's fine so something has changed in recent versions. A bug?

That being said, the file IS placing at 100%, it's just reporting 75% incorrectly for some reason. Since your resolution in the file is 96ppi and your file is 5000 pixels wide, it should place at 52" wide, which it does.

 

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Enthusiast ,
Sep 16, 2024 Sep 16, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Thanks Brad! 

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Sep 16, 2024 Sep 16, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I believe that only 72 ppi images are seen as 100%

My Mac screendumps are 144 ppi and seen as 50%.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Sep 17, 2024 Sep 17, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Depends. Sometimes yes, sometimes no. We went down this rabbit hole before. Unfortunately I can't find the thread, but I remember we found that certain pixel dimension thresholds would trigger a scaling, like Illustrator is trying to "help us" keep the image at a workable size on the current artboard.

In any case, the behaviour is all over the place.

This is what I have found: CC2020 and CC2021 left everything at 100%. Starting with CC2022, it started reporting a scale factor in the Links. CC2024 went even further.

Screen Shot 2024-09-17 at 10.11.00 AM.png

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Sep 17, 2024 Sep 17, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

On my Mac it is consistent, no differences between filetypes and between 2023 and 2024.

Edit: only when files are Embedded.

Screenshot 2024-09-17 at 20.50.10.png

Link to the .ai file:

https://shared-assets.adobe.com/link/421e3f48-c45c-4aa7-7bfd-ebce6bfe0d43

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Sep 17, 2024 Sep 17, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I think that Brad and Roger are referring to linked images, Ton.

 

Do you get the same consistency with linked images? Or rather what Brad outlined with his table?

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Sep 17, 2024 Sep 17, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I'll check again with linked images. These were all embedded.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Sep 17, 2024 Sep 17, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Yes, i was refrerring to Linked files.

Interestingly, if I make a CC2020 document and place all the sizes in my test (reported as 100% in LInks panel), and then open that file in CC2024, all the reported percentages change.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Sep 17, 2024 Sep 17, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Another interesting behaviour;

When a 144 ppi Tif image is placed linked it shows 144 ppi at 100%

When a 72 ppi Tif image is placed linked and scaled 50% it shows 144 ppi at 50%

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Sep 17, 2024 Sep 17, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

"When a 72 ppi Tif image is placed linked and scaled 50% it shows 144 ppi at 50%"

Yah, I saw that (and other weirdness) too.

It comes down to: why did Adobe's coders think this is preferable behaviour than a few versions ago. I can't see any practical reason for it.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Sep 17, 2024 Sep 17, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

And don't start rotating images and try to make sense of the resolution.

I think the correct way would be to report the image resolution and set the scale to 100% when no scaling is done during or after placing the image.

I have searched for a UserVoice report, but could not find it.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Sep 17, 2024 Sep 17, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

It is indeed a mess, but less a mess than Brad's mess for me.

The behaviour is indeed different when images are linked.

When images are linked:

In 2023 the .tif files are displaying 100% scale at all resolutions

In 2023  the .jpg files are displaying 100% scale at all resolutions

In 2023  the .png files are displaying a different % scale at different resolutions

2023 linked.png

In 2024 the .tif files are displaying 100% scale at all resolutions

In 2024  the .jpeg and .png files are displaying a different % scale at different resolutions

2024 linked.png

 

When images are embedded:

both 2023 and 2024 show consistent scale percentages for resolutions for all file types.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Sep 17, 2024 Sep 17, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Thankfully, at least the cat seems to be able to take all that different pressures without mental suffering.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Sep 17, 2024 Sep 17, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

He is long gone and has nothing to worry anymore.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Sep 17, 2024 Sep 17, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Surely that is Nozem, Ton?

 

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Sep 17, 2024 Sep 17, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Yes it is, Jacob!

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Sep 18, 2024 Sep 18, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

LATEST

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines