Exit
  • Global community
    • Language:
      • Deutsch
      • English
      • Español
      • Français
      • Português
  • 日本語コミュニティ
  • 한국 커뮤니티
0

Is there a way to drag and drop a single image from a Windows folder into a catalogue quickly?

New Here ,
Oct 01, 2025 Oct 01, 2025

I just started using Lightroom after using Gimp for a long time and I am not finding it intuitive at all. 

Yes, I can theoretically drag and drop in a single image I want to work on but then the import dialogue loads in a very laggy way because its trying to load all the thumbnails of every single photo in the folder unnecessarily, and then when I click import, it takes about 20s for the single picture to show up. 

The drag and drop function is instantaneous on every single application I've ever used. What gives?

 

For context, I have tens of thousands of photos so it's not really worth the hassle to me to import everything into the Lightroom Catalogue. I just want to import what I've decided to edit. 

Is there an easier/ faster way to do this?

TOPICS
Windows
106
Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
LEGEND ,
Oct 01, 2025 Oct 01, 2025

You cannot bypass the Import screen in Lightroom Classic. You would be better off dragging and dropping many photos at once, instead of one at a time. Essentially doing it one photo at a time is not really the way LrC was designed to work, and thus not optimal.

 

If you keep thousands of photos in a single folder (in other word, not in subfolders), this process will be slow.

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Oct 01, 2025 Oct 01, 2025

If you really do not want to use the Lightroom paradigm (of an accumulated image library) but prefer to treat digital photo files individually, essentially the same image editing tools are available within the Adobe Camera Raw input filter for Photoshop. For example: applying preset looks or manual adjustment, global and localised, with some limited retouching. PS is already configured so that whenever a Raw file is opened, the ACR window pops up and then you can apply parametric editing onto this. This editing is then saved back to the file (unless you Cancel out) by the Done button so that it will still be there when you return to the same image. Alternatively it is saved out plus the image is brought into PS itself, if you click Open.

 

Optionally PS settings for ACR can be configured so that the same thing will also happen for different image file types besides Raw. ACR provides "snapshots" so that multiple parametric treatments all referring back to the same source file can be named, saved and then later recalled. It's all a bit clunkier and less fluid IMO than the LRc interface but technically the end result can be pretty much the same. Just, be aware that outputting results of editing is likely to be found a lot less efficient. 

 

This environment does lack a lot of the bulk management, virtual organisation, editing and output facilities that (any variant of) Lightroom provides, but if only considering images one-by-one and manually, those things will scarcely apply anyway. 

 

A suitable front-end for navigating and managing images under this workflow, and opening them up for editing, might be Adobe Bridge or some other equivalent. Effectively Adobe offers two paradigms: library based and file based. We need to be clear-eyed about whichever is the best fit for us. Unfamiliarity, though, has little to do with that choice.

 

Initial experience of Lightroom often involves some - perhaps quite unsettling - UN-learning of rules of thumb that may previously have gone unquestioned. Only then can the value of the library based approach be appreciated and profited from. There is some mental threshold to get over, in other words. But this is not to say everyone must prefer life on the other side of this! This forum is made up of those converts by and large.

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Oct 01, 2025 Oct 01, 2025

I frequently use the Auto Import function by keeping a 'watched folder' on my desktop (Windows-11).

It is  a simple matter (When the watched folder is visible) to simply drag any image from anywhere (File explorer, emails, even this forum screen!) onto the Auto Import folder. It appears in the 'Previous Import' list quite fast without the full Import dialog. The watched folder can even 'store' photos in it until Lr-Classic is opened and the photos will all import.

2025-10-01 21_03_55-.jpg

https://helpx.adobe.com/lightroom-classic/help/import-photos-automatically.html#main-pars_header_0

 

 

Regards. My System: Windows-11, Lightroom-Classic 14.5.1, Photoshop 26.10, ACR 17.5, Lightroom 8.5, Lr-iOS 10.4.0, Bridge 15.1.1 .
Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
New Here ,
Oct 01, 2025 Oct 01, 2025

Thanks! I will give this a go. I was thinking to try dragging and dropping into an empty folder first and then into Lightroom, but this sounds more efficient.

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Oct 01, 2025 Oct 01, 2025
LATEST

" was thinking to try dragging and dropping into an empty folder first and then into Lightroom"

That's exactly what the Auto Import feature does.

You place an image file in the 'watched folder', Lr-Classic automatically moves it to a 'Destination folder' (that you have defined) and indexes the image in the LrC catalog.

I don't recommend Auto Import for large numbers of files as it inherently must move files, but for one or two it can be convenient.

 

"I have tens of thousands of photos so it's not really worth the hassle to me to import everything into the Lightroom Catalogue".  IMO it is worth the effort- The prime reason to use Lr-Classic is to index a comprehensive catalog of all your files allowing you to find them easily and cull, edit, export, etc.

 

Regards. My System: Windows-11, Lightroom-Classic 14.5.1, Photoshop 26.10, ACR 17.5, Lightroom 8.5, Lr-iOS 10.4.0, Bridge 15.1.1 .
Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Advocate ,
Oct 01, 2025 Oct 01, 2025

Lightroom and GIMP are completely different applications with different purposes. Photoshop works the same as GIMP, since it is a pixel editing application and not a digital asset manager/organizer.

The intention is that you import everything into Lightroom, use that to organize, and do editing in Photoshop or another pixel editor. Lightroom does not have anywhere near the range of tools that you would find in GIMP or Photoshop.

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines