Well, I have to agree with Jock.
Adobe: Where has your SQA gone?
Oh, I better spell that out since the LR team may not know about it. It's Software Quality Assurance.
As much as I would like to rush out and purchase CS4, I'm not going to buy it, and I'm not going to recommend my peers go out and buy it. If Adobe can't get it right by having LR 2 or 2.1 open a file in Photoshop CS3... Oh, wait! That's an Adobe product too. Ah, all the more reason they should be able to figure it out.
I'm really ticked off at Adobe at this point. I right click on a photo, and select "Edit in Photoshop CS3... " and Photoshop CS3 comes up and it just sits there and does NOTHING. Then, several seconds later I get a message, "The file could not be edited because Adobe Photoshop CS3 could not be launched."
What?
Photoshop CS3 WAS launched. (At this point I'm reminding me that I'm not opening the image in ACDSee 10 which would mean the folks at ACD Systems screwed up, but I'm trying to edit in an Adobe product.) Yet, Photoshop didn't open my file.
Am I supposed to get excited about CS4 integration with Photoshop and Flash and Illustrator and... oh, heck.. .it doesn't matter because I'm going to wait until others have spent all their hard-earned money and tested it and debugged it for the Adobe SQA team, and Adobe has come up with a CS4 service pack to fix the bugs that will most likely exist.
I'll quit my griping. But, in all seriousness. If Adobe is going to charge $299 for LR, then they better make sure it is bug free before selling it. People are not going to continue to pay high prices, and will go back to what they were using before LR.
Likewise, if CS4 hits the streets and has as many bugs as LR 2.1, we will be hearing about bailouts for Adobe too.
So, Adobe, get it together. Money's tight these days, and if we, your customers, are going to spend money on your products, you better fix what you have sold to us.