• Global community
    • Language:
      • Deutsch
      • English
      • Español
      • Français
      • Português
  • 日本語コミュニティ
    Dedicated community for Japanese speakers
  • 한국 커뮤니티
    Dedicated community for Korean speakers
Exit
0

Performance issues by large number of smart collections?

Engaged ,
Nov 15, 2024 Nov 15, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Does the “excessive” use of Smart Collections slow down LrC? Should its use be limited or does it not matter in your experience?

The background to my question:
I use a location-based folder structure and have “mirrored” this structure as a collection set with (normal) collections. Unfortunately, I always have to remember to synchronize the collections manually when, for example, new images are added to a location. That’s why I’m thinking about solving the whole issue with Smart Collections. Because that would result in a large number of smart collections, I would like to clarify in advance whether I could fall into a performance trap.

What are your thoughts or experiences?

Greetings, Thomas

TOPICS
Windows

Views

101

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Nov 15, 2024 Nov 15, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I guess I use them "excessively", or at least I have many of them - and not on the latest hardware. So no, slowdown isn't an issue.

 

I'd suggest only setting up smart collections that you do actually need, not putting your time and energy into creating ones speculatively in expectation that they might be needed someday. Remember too that you have the Library Filter and can save your own column presets there.

 

Also, smart collections are only as good as the underlying metadata, so put more effort into adding metadata rather than building neat smart collection hierarchies. It often helps to think in these terms:

  • Folders are only about physical safekeeping - storage, guaranteed backup, easy to restore
  • Cataegorisation and analysis is a job for keywords and other metadata
  • Use collections to collect or gather images for whatever you need at the time

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Engaged ,
Nov 15, 2024 Nov 15, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

LATEST

I don't plan to create a whole lot of "speculatively helpful" smart collections. In fact I use a set of "organizational keywords" to build "really smart" 😉 smart collections for my organizational needs.

This is very handy because e.g. you can "fill" multiple collections during import just by applying the suitable keywords. For normal collections you can only choose one per import.

Another thing I was thinking about ist, duplicating some of the smart collections to have them sitting in my collection hierarchy at different locatins, to make things easier. I have a "Maintenance" collection set, where all of them are located. This is handy when I am doing a "maintenance session" once a week or month. But some of these I could use day by day if I had them in sight e.g. in my "Locations" collection set. 
That's when it is practical to have it sit on two locations and not having to decide where to put it. But if this would slow LrC down, I'd have have to reconsider. 

So, it's good to hear that this is probably not the case. Thanks and BR, Thomas

 

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines