• Global community
    • Language:
      • Deutsch
      • English
      • Español
      • Français
      • Português
  • 日本語コミュニティ
    Dedicated community for Japanese speakers
  • 한국 커뮤니티
    Dedicated community for Korean speakers
Exit
192

P: Support Common Image Formats (EPS, GIF, PDF, BMP etc.)

Contributor ,
Jan 19, 2012 Jan 19, 2012

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Feature request: Please add Lightroom support for common Adobe publishing and Web image formats, such as EPS, AI, PDF, GIF, and PNG.

Many of us use Lightroom to manage client images in NEF, JPG, PSD and other formats. But the clients' associated images, which are used on their Websites and in their logos and publications, are invisible to Lightroom. If Adobe Bridge can display these other image formats, why can't Lightroom?

Even if Lightroom did not provide direct editing support for these other image formats, it would still be extremely useful if Lightroom could catalog and display them.

It would also elevate Lightroom from being "just" a photo editor into the realm of being a true Digital Asset Manager (DAM). Now that Lightroom includes basic video support - isn't it time to support all the common image formats that our other CS applications use?

Please vote for, as well as reply to, this request if you would also like to see Lightroom support these additional common image formats...

Idea No status
TOPICS
macOS , Windows

Views

5.3K

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
replies 273 Replies 273
273 Comments
Community Expert ,
May 07, 2014 May 07, 2014

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Thanks, but I don't need you asking me to see the big picture. As I said before, I've long been in favour of LR letting the photographer choose what types of files to manage in the catalogue. No argument there. Non-maximized PSDs are the issue Martijn raised, and to which I responded.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Beginner ,
Jun 05, 2014 Jun 05, 2014

Copy link to clipboard

Copied



Even photographers have logos and artwork to go with their photos.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Contributor ,
Jun 05, 2014 Jun 05, 2014

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Indeed, reinecke. That is why it would be extremely useful for Lightroom to provide support for more of the common image formats.

Thanks for supporting this feature request. ...pt

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Beginner ,
Jun 21, 2014 Jun 21, 2014

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I found a work-around with "AnyFile" Lightroom plugin. It has limitations but with the 30 day free trial and a cost of "a donation" it is worth examining. I found it at
http://www.johnrellis.com/lightroom/a....
I installed it and have had no problems.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Contributor ,
Jun 21, 2014 Jun 21, 2014

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I'm glad, reinecke, that the AnyFile plugin workaround meets your needs.

I tried Anyfile a couple of years ago and found it annoying in my own situation. Although I have since forgotten the details, I seem to recall a clutter of placeholder files. And due to the way my network attached storage device allocates space, I think each placeholder was taking up much more space than one would expect.

In any event, I quickly gave up on AnyFile. For me it was not a satisfactory replacement for Lightroom providing adequate file support in the first place.

But I'm glad you like it. Others might want to check it out, too. ...pt

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Explorer ,
Jun 21, 2014 Jun 21, 2014

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

yup, I too tried it, and I wish I could use it. Its been a while maybe it is rewritten, but I had to stop using it also.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Participant ,
Jun 23, 2014 Jun 23, 2014

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

AnyFile is way too fiddly for me. It's very badly integrated into Lightroom's regular functions. And it creates extraneous "placeholder" files that just goes against my principles.

One might as well use a second program to catalog unsupported files, which why this needs to be either natively in Lightroom, or waaaaay better integrated with a plugin.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Beginner ,
Apr 08, 2015 Apr 08, 2015

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Hey Adobe. Why is not possible, practical or worth the effort to support .ai and other formats?
Yes, this is my second post.
It is annoying to have to open Bridge to see my .ai files.
I am not a programmer, but untutored logic suggests that if Bridge can see the .ai files, then Lightroom should be able to.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Contributor ,
Apr 08, 2015 Apr 08, 2015

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Yes, reinecke.

You are right - "It is annoying to have to open Bridge to see" our other graphics files.

Lightroom should support more common image formats.

Best regards. ...pt

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
New Here ,
Aug 27, 2015 Aug 27, 2015

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I couldn't agree more. I'm doing all kinds of photography tasks for my client including post processing images they give me. I need Lightroom to help me catalog all the files I work with.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Enthusiast ,
Aug 27, 2015 Aug 27, 2015

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

well the request is over 4 years old.

adobe cares a sh*t.... obviously.
every shareware coder could do it in less time.

i mean most lightroom user are on subscription anyway.. so why do something?

a few crappy beta features every 6 month keeps most of the lemmings hooked.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Enthusiast ,
Aug 27, 2015 Aug 27, 2015

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

and bridge get ́s no love either as you may noticed......

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Contributor ,
Aug 27, 2015 Aug 27, 2015

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Yes, Barry, Lightroom would be more useful if it supported more common image file formats.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Contributor ,
Aug 27, 2015 Aug 27, 2015

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Indeed, Tanja, it would be nice if Adobe actually listened to its customers. This feature request is one that quite a few Adobe customers would appreciate.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Explorer ,
Aug 27, 2015 Aug 27, 2015

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

A pretty typical pattern methinks ... to boost profits in the new "shareholders matter more than anyone or anything else" economy, you cut the team to the bone and work on one or two whiz bang features per release, leaving glaring deficiencies and gaping holes to fester for year after year.

However, there is a way to make improvements and that is to strike a 50/50 balance between new features and GUI / usability improvements. This is where Adobe seem to fall short.

More supported formats, much better responsiveness with face detection running in the background, discarding clicks while the GUI is frozen to prevent random actions, and so on ... lots and lots of features that could really improve the experience.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Beginner ,
Sep 24, 2015 Sep 24, 2015

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I've only recently become aware of another need for GIF file support - in particular: for Animated GIFs or Cinemagraphs produced by Photoshop CC 2015. So, I'm really surprised to discover my LR CC 2015 is unable to add them to the catalogue.

I also notice that Bridge is listed under "Previous Versions" in that ridiculous Creative Cloud App that take so long to verify my account - a possible indicator that Adobe is allowing Bridge to vanish altogether.

And another thing: they are unable to change my Adobe ID (i.e. my email) and say I must delete my current subscription and create a new one to do this. I find that to be pathetic.

All this is causing me to become p***ed off and look elsewhere, but there just isn't a viable Photoshop alternative for the type of work I do. They have me by the short and curlys.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Participant ,
Sep 24, 2015 Sep 24, 2015

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

About your first paragraph: precisely. Adobe knows damn well how to read animated GIFs, and Lightroom is already capable of handling video - Animated GIF is nothing but mute video in essence.

About your other statements: a bit offtopic, is it not? I suggest you create a different topic for those, although I do agree.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Beginner ,
Sep 24, 2015 Sep 24, 2015

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I've posted a similar post on the Adobe forum and got a near instant response from support. He says Adobe are working on an updated Bridge. Most of my work ends up in Photoshop, so I mainly use LR only for RAW conversion, exporting, and its catalogue. Maybe an updated Bridge will suite me better.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Explorer ,
Sep 24, 2015 Sep 24, 2015

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Sigh ... Adobe continue to run like two separate teams that only loosely collaborate, and that really hurts the suite. Heck, I pay 10 bucks a month in perpetuity so that I can use both seamlessly ... and that vision has certainly not quite arrived ...

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Beginner ,
Nov 03, 2015 Nov 03, 2015

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I would love to be able to import non-image files into Lightroom's database. It would be a very useful feature.

An example of where this would be useful: I occasionally have additional files which are associated with a set of photos. Notes in text files, information in PDFs, audio files, and so on. I can copy these files to the same folder as the photos in the library. But without the ability to see these files in Lightroom, to add keywords and make them searchable, they are effectively lost forever among the thousands of other files and directories.

The ability to manage these files in Lightroom would be extremely valuable. I would not expect Lightroom to support editing or even preview of non-image files. Just the ability to keep track of them.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
LEGEND ,
Nov 03, 2015 Nov 03, 2015

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Check out my Any File plugin -- it's intended for exactly this purpose. Not as convenient as having it builtin to LR, but it gets the job done.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Beginner ,
Nov 03, 2015 Nov 03, 2015

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Without any kind of announcement to my knowledge, it is now possible to change your Adobe ID. Something that may be necessary if you change your email supplier as I have done. Well done Adobe, you've done something that Apple is incapable of, but zero marks for not informing me that this is now possible.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Beginner ,
Nov 03, 2015 Nov 03, 2015

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Another option is to wait until Affinity launch their DAM in 2016.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
LEGEND ,
Jan 09, 2017 Jan 09, 2017

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I've just found this out and am gobsmacked. I created the GIF in Photoshop from a series of photos, exported it, and now can't use it in Lightroom. Yet Lightroom reads videos. Astounding. I came to Adobe Creative CLoud because it was supposed to be more of a standard than the DAM that I had been using. Now I find it does less. My vote has been cast for Adobe to include them, even if only to enable Lightroom to be more of a PROPER cataloguing program. I thought so! I previously had Photoshop Elements 12, and that can handle GIFs and also PDF files. Now I am even more amazed that the supposedly professional better option cannot.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
LEGEND ,
Jan 09, 2017 Jan 09, 2017

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

hi John Please could you explain how to get it? I have gone to the Adobe Add-ons page and searched for Any File, anyfile, any - but not got a result at all. Searching for file finds something totally unrelated. OK I did a google search and found it on your home page, rather than on adobe. It is a free trial then paid for (albeit with a very friendly option) plug-in. Not sure its worthwhile for so far one GIF, but I will have to see what other files I'm missing compared to my previous DAM program.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report