ai images getting rejected

[optimistic_vibrancy8856]

Why are most of my AI-generated images being rejected, while some top AI contributors, despite submitting excessive similar assets, low-resolution images, and easily noticeable errors, are still accepted?

[daniellei4510]

First, excessive similar assets should not be submitted and once discovered, those accounts can possibly end up being disabled. Not sure what you mean by low-resolution images, as Adobe requires a minimum of 4MPs or the asset will not even upload. Yes, unfortunately, there are assets that do pass moderation that should not have. Eventually, a buyer...if such assets being bought at all...will complain and the account will be investigated.

[optimistic_vibrancy8856]

Thank you for the reply. Is it okay to upload hundreds of images on the same topic? For example, creating images of all existing vegetables, and then doing the same with fruits, flowers, plants, insects, etc. Or is it better to create images where each one is completely different?

[daniellei4510]

That question is difficult to answer without seeing examples or knowing specifically what you're getting at. Hundreds of images of an orange, for example? Probably not a good idea. 

[Jill_C]

I suppose you can do that if you want (fruits, flowers, vegetables) but such topics in general are already over represented in the Adobe stock database and are unlikely to generate a lot of sales unless you've found a unique way to create such images.

[Abambo]

Thank you for the reply. Is it okay to upload hundreds of images on the same topic?

By @optimistic_vibrancy8856

As long as you do not get banned for spamming...

If the assets are different enough, you can do. You could, as an example post pictures of oranges, apples, grapes etc, all in the same setting (for AI probably exchanging just the name of the fruit in the prompt) as a buyer in need of oranges is not buying grapes. But posting 100 assets with oranges would probably not be OK.

[Jill_C]

You said: "Why are most of my AI-generated images being rejected, while some top AI contributors, despite submitting excessive similar assets, low-resolution images, and easily noticeable errors, are still accepted?"

The sample you included has easily detectable flaws and should have been rejected. It's easy to find flawed AI images in the database. Some early submissions after Adobe just started accepting AI were particularly bad because Moderators were not experienced at reviewing such assets, and Adobe's standards were perhaps more lax than they are now. But even now, flawed images escape the close scrutiny of Moderators. They probably will never be sold, and if a Buyer logs a complaint after licensing such as image, the entire account can be suspended for review. The existence of flawed images in the database does NOT mean that Adobe should continue accepting flawed images in the future. 

[jacquelingphoto2017]

@optimistic_vibrancy8856 ,

The edge of the image is not sharp. The eyes are looking in different direction and are not in line. Also, one eye is larger than the other.

I count about three chins - one with beard and two others.

Best wishes

Jacquelin

[Abambo]

Why are most of my AI-generated images being rejected, while some top AI contributors, despite submitting excessive similar assets, low-resolution images, and easily noticeable errors, are still accepted?

By @optimistic_vibrancy8856

Many of the formerly top contriputors got locked out, because of violating the terms of the contributor agreement. 

[Abambo]

Only some of the rendering errors in this picture: