Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Hello! A lot of my ai-generated images have been rejected recently. There's never been such a large number of rejections due to quality. I would appreciate it if you could help me notice what the problem might be. Attached are sample images below.
Thanks in advance!
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Fur does not create a hard edge. You need a soft blend into the background.
In addition, you see aliasing in this 100%-view screenshot.
The white border around the paw:
The paw itself does not look naturally.
Difference in the eyes, even that it is an error, I doubt that the moderator refused or would refuse for such a reason.
Side view dog: besides the wrong white balance, you have colour noise:
There is colour clipping:
The nose is weird (again, I do not think the moderator would refuse for this):
The lungs:
That is, for once, a nice picture idea.
There are artefacts and colour clipping, if you look at your asset at 100%:
The hands:
1) the fingers don't look correct
2) there is noise
I also find that the contrast is not right.
The histogram is showing missing blacks and missing whites.
Geometry artefact (left hand):
Colour artefact (right hand):
Hat:
Artefacts and aliasing:
The hat's resolution is not good enough. It looks like a badly upsized image.
Molecular structure:
I doubt that this one is correct, even, if you would correct the visual errors:
In addition, it is noisy. Be careful with such assets. You can be banned for this, as you pretend showing the real thing.
The woman:
11:
Spring:
noise, white balance, aliasing, drawing errors and missing contrasts:
(next time post only one or two assets, subsequently, you will probably yourself able to see the errors. All errors here are easy catches.)
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I looked at a few, and found drawings errors in each.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Being a bright, sunny day, I think the shadows could have been opened up quite a bit.
Just a couple minor issues that popped out to me.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Also, as far as I could tell, none of these images have an sRGB color profile. In fact, they have no assigned profile at all, since most AI programs don't appear to insert one. I doubt this would be a reason for rejection, but Adobe does specifically state that submissions should have an embedded sRGB profile.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Also, as far as I could tell, none of these images have an sRGB color profile. In fact, they have no assigned profile at all, since most AI programs don't appear to insert one. I doubt this would be a reason for rejection, but Adobe does specifically state that submissions should have an embedded sRGB profile.
By @daniellei4510
Yes, the profile is mandatory, but I never saw a refusal on this. However, if you submit a picture, that is not sRGB, the colours will be wrong. And that will be a refusal reason. Not all programs are interpreting the colour profiles, and that may cause issues with different viewers and when the customer complains, your asset will be deleted.
If your AI is not attributing a profile, it is safe to assign sRGB to the files.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Embedding an sRGB file into an AI images is also something that's easy to forget to do. I've set my "Edit... Color Settings" to the following: