feedback: rejected images

[lucasb46308447]

Hello everyone seeing this post. I'd appreciate feedback on the quality of these images. Thank you!

I look forward to contributing feedback as well! 

[hardqor4ik]

Well, everything is clear with the first image, black stripes on the bottom and top)

[lucasb46308447]

Noted! Thank you for taking the time!

[Robert McAlpine]

THe second image, the people are out of focus.  The plane of focus is the bottle not the people's eyes.

[daniellei4510]

First one: I think the woman only has for fingers. I'm assuming the black border at the top and bottom were removed before submitting. Not sure if the "elephant in the room" works here. Do a search for elephant in the room and see how others have handled this,.

[lucasb46308447]

Thank you for the feedback!

[daniellei4510]

Any time.

[Jill_C]

elephant-in-room8--enhanced.png - the image is underexposed, and the bottle label has gibberish text. The man's fingers are malformed - his pinky finger is the same size as his ring finger.

elephant-in-room1--enhanced.png - man's fingers are also malformed, as well as baby's feet and hand. Underexposed. 

Also, you should be submitting these as png's as that file format is only to be used for transparencies.

[lucasb46308447]

Thank you! Solid advise!

[Nancy OShea]

Both images are very dark.

Was this done with generative AI?  I ask because the woman's skin looks unnaturally synthetic.

[lucasb46308447]

Great point! Thank you!

[Ricky336]

Hello,

Images are too dark, If you were going for the 'cinematic' look, it is advised not to use filters, as the type of look can be added to individual needs.

This might be helpful:

Generative AI Content (adobe.com)

[lucasb46308447]

Thank you! Great advice! I appreciate you taking the time.

--
*Lucas Boyd | CEO/CMO *

Personal information removed by the moderator

Don't give personal information