Has anything changed in the review process?
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Has anything changed in the review process? I've noticed that when I upload multiple images from the collection (10-20), only a maximum of 3-5 images get approved for listing in the portfolio, while the rest remain under review. Why is that? In a way, it's better if too many similar images can no longer be uploaded through an automated AI process, but I'm still not entirely sure about it.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
There seems to have been a change in the review program and there are an excessive number of rejections.
I recommend taking a look at past posts and Discord posts.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
My images were not rejected, but out of a set of 10-20 images from the same collection, only 4-5 were added to my portfolio. The rest remained under review for one to two weeks with no response, so I deleted them myself.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
One or two weeks is not long enough. Adobe even states that reviews can take up to 8 weeks. Some are taking months. A few have reported images under review for over a year.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
The rest remained under review for one to two weeks with no response, so I deleted them myself.
By Vision350771902ejx
Two weeks is no time. Standard review as per Adobe's indication is up to 8 weeks. Some report delays around a year.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I am presently having only 1 or 2 assets reviewed per day. And most of those are being marked (erroneously, I believe) as being too similar to other assets I've submitted. Adobe appears to have made and is continuing to make sweeping policy changes due to what I believe is the oversaturation and bulk loading of AI assets. These changes are hurting both photographers and AI contributors alike, in my opinion. One year ago, I was selling more assets per day with only 2000 assets available, compared to far fewer sales today with over 5,500 assets. When it comes to AI, less is more. Some have called for a minimum of 50 submissions per day, which I believe is still too many, since they aren't being reviewed in bulk in any case. Well, some are. We have people complaining that only 100 or 200 of their daily submissions of 500+ are being reviewed while the rest are being ignored. It's getting messy.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I haven't received any response for some of my images—they are simply skipped. Out of a collection of 10-20 images, only 4-5 are added to my portfolio, while the rest remain under review. I don't get any feedback on whether they are too similar or not—nothing happens at all!
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I haven't received any response for some of my images—they are simply skipped. Out of a collection of 10-20 images, only 4-5 are added to my portfolio, while the rest remain under review. I don't get any feedback on whether they are too similar or not—nothing happens at all!
By Vision350771902ejx
If you tink that they are too similar, they probably are.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
This is not entirely fair, as some people have previously overloaded the server with AI images and now have an advantage over those who can no longer upload AI images.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
This is not entirely fair, as some people have previously overloaded the server with AI images and now have an advantage over those who can no longer upload AI images.
By Vision350771902ejx
Nobody promised you that stock is a fair business. You still can submit generative AI assets, however. Since Adobe started accepting generative AI, there are delays in moderation.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Try submitting other types of content besides AI.
Drawings, vector graphics, actual photographs, videos, etc...

