Copy link to clipboard
Copied
This photo mine was not accepted beacuse of infringment of Interlectual property. I fail to see how this photo of a landscape of a lake and mountains infringes intelectual property.
Def: "intellectual property (IP) refers to creations of the mind, such as inventions; literary and artistic works; designs; and symbols, names and images used in commerce."
[Moderator moved the thread to the correct forum]
This image does NOT meet Adobe's quality standards, and that fact is indisputable.
The 1st image is a commercial building with signs that need to be removed or obscured. The second image appears to be private homes for which you would need the owners' permission to use.
Long story short: A well-known photographer took a photo of a lighthouse and included it in a calendar of his images. The owner of the lighthouse came across the calendar and sued the photographer for a percentage of the royalties gained by its sales.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
How is pointing out the actual, noticeable quality issues in the image making "lame excuses"????
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
That was not the reason that it was not accepted. I don't agree with the of quality either because it was accepted in other sitesSent from Outlook for Android<>
By @vinodk28939938
I agree on the quality issue, independant from Adobe. But: by experience: the white balance is way off, and that alone will lead to a quality refusal.
But at the end: if we agree or not, a refusal is a refusal, and there is no possibility to discuss this with the moderators.
The IP issue is to be seen here:
On the same image here you also see chromatic aberration. In addition there is noise and I think the sharpness is not good enough (I did not check that, however).
Find more inspiration, events, and resources on the new Adobe Community
Explore Now