Exit
  • Global community
    • Language:
      • Deutsch
      • English
      • Español
      • Français
      • Português
  • 日本語コミュニティ
  • 한국 커뮤니티
0

Here we go again - Photo rejected for infringement of Interllectual Property

Community Beginner ,
Dec 25, 2024 Dec 25, 2024

This photo mine was not accepted beacuse of infringment of Interlectual property. I fail to see how this photo of a landscape of a lake and mountains infringes intelectual property.

Def: "intellectual property (IP) refers to creations of the mind, such as inventions; literary and artistic works; designs; and symbols, names and images used in commerce." IMG_9120.jpg

[Moderator moved the thread to the correct forum]

TOPICS
Contributor critique
1.2K
Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines

correct answers 3 Correct answers

Community Expert , Dec 25, 2024 Dec 25, 2024

This image does NOT meet Adobe's quality standards, and that fact is indisputable.

IMG_1412.jpegIMG_1411.jpeg

 

Translate
Community Expert , Dec 26, 2024 Dec 26, 2024

The 1st  image is a commercial building with signs that need to be removed or obscured. The second image appears to be private homes for which you would need the owners' permission to use.

Translate
Community Expert , Dec 27, 2024 Dec 27, 2024

Long story short: A well-known photographer took a photo of a lighthouse and included it in a calendar of his images. The owner of the lighthouse came across the calendar and sued the photographer for a percentage of the royalties gained by its sales. 

Translate
Community Expert ,
Dec 26, 2024 Dec 26, 2024

How is pointing out the actual, noticeable quality issues in the image making "lame excuses"????

Jill C., Forum Volunteer
Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Dec 30, 2024 Dec 30, 2024
quote
That was not the reason that it was not accepted. I don't agree with the of quality either because it was accepted in other sitesSent from Outlook for Android<>
By @vinodk28939938

I agree on the quality issue, independant from Adobe. But: by experience: the white balance is way off, and that alone will lead to a quality refusal. 

 

But at the end: if we agree or not, a refusal is a refusal, and there is no possibility to discuss this with the moderators.

The IP issue is to be seen here: IMG_2515.jpeg

On the same image here you also see chromatic aberration. In addition there is noise and I think the sharpness is not good enough (I did not check that, however).

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines